Skip to content
parteiprogramm

Linke on migration and integration

From the program “Everyone wants to govern. We want change.”

2025 federal election, February 23, 2025Original PDF, 60 pagesAnalyzed on October 2, 2026

AIThe summaries and placements on this page were written by AI. No person reviews each one. How they are made

Placement on Migration and integration

Average of the points on this page. The placement is made by AI.

Each axis measures one topic. There is no single "left" or "right" for everything here: economy, society, migration and security are kept apart. Only what the program says is placed. How to read the placement

  • Economyleaning more state (-1), from 1 point

    Points per step: 0 clearly more state, 1 leaning more state, 0 balanced, 0 leaning more market, 0 clearly more market

  • Europebalanced (-0.5), from 2 points

    Points per step: 0 clearly more EU, 1 leaning more EU, 1 balanced, 0 leaning less EU, 0 clearly less EU

  • Migrationclearly open (-2), from 6 points

    Points per step: 6 clearly open, 0 leaning open, 0 balanced, 0 leaning restrictive, 0 clearly restrictive

The small columns under the bars show how many points sit on each of the five steps.

Work permits and cash benefits for refugees

The Left wants refugees to be allowed to work without restriction from their first day. They should live in apartments rather than group shelters and receive cash instead of in-kind benefits or payment cards. Municipalities should get more federal money for hosting them.

Refugees should be allowed to work right away. They should live in normal apartments. They should get money and not a payment card. The federal government should pay towns and cities for the costs.

The work permit would apply without limits from the day of arrival. Refugees would be housed in apartments spread across the country and offered free language courses everywhere. Instead of in-kind benefits and payment cards, the platform calls for cash payments at the level of the minimum income the party plans. A fund would support municipalities willing to take in refugees, and the money could also be used for general public services. The federal government would fully cover housing costs through a per-person flat rate.

Show the original quote (page 52)
„Statt diskriminierender Sachleistungen und Bezahlkarten wollen wir reguläre Geldleistungen auf Höhe der solidarischen Mindestsicherung für alle Menschen.“

Translation: Instead of discriminatory in-kind benefits and payment cards, we want regular cash benefits at the level of the solidarity-based minimum income for all people.

Page 52 in the original

Placement

  • Economyleaning more state

    Higher benefits and full federal coverage of costs mean more public spending.

  • Migrationclearly open

    Work bans, payment cards and reduced benefits for asylum seekers would be dropped, fundamentally expanding refugees' rights.

Replace Frontex with civilian sea rescue

The Left wants to dissolve the EU border agency Frontex and replace it with a civilian European sea rescue program. Pushbacks, meaning turning people away without a procedure, should stop. The party points to the thousands who die at Europe's borders each year.

Frontex is the EU's border agency. The Left wants to shut Frontex down. Instead, the EU should rescue people at sea. Nobody should simply be sent back at the border.

Existing tools for monitoring the Mediterranean and the external borders would be used for rescue. Private sea rescuers would no longer face prosecution. The platform calls pushbacks illegal. The party wants to cancel refugee deals with Turkey, with militias and with authoritarian governments.

Show the original quote (page 52)
„Die EU-Abschottungsagentur Frontex muss aufgelöst und durch ein ziviles europäisches Seenotrettungsprogramm ersetzt werden.“

Translation: The EU's sealing-off agency Frontex must be dissolved and replaced by a civilian European sea rescue program.

Page 52 in the original

Placement

  • Migrationclearly open

    Abolishing the border agency and the refugee deals would fundamentally shift today's border policy toward openness.

Reject tighter asylum laws and the CEAS

The Left rejects all previous tightening of asylum law and the Common European Asylum System (GEAS/CEAS). Every person seeking protection should get an individual procedure with legal remedies, including at the EU's external borders. There should be no fast-track procedures or detention of people seeking protection.

The Left is against stricter asylum rules. It also rejects the EU's new asylum system. Every person should get their own asylum procedure. Nobody should be locked up for seeking asylum.

The party calls for uniform, high protection standards and rejects safe third country and safe country of origin rules. In Germany, welfare organizations and associations would provide independent advice to asylum seekers. Persecution based on sexual orientation or gender identity should be recognized in practice as grounds for asylum. The platform considers systematic internal border checks and turning people away there impermissible. It cites the European Court of Human Rights, the Geneva Refugee Convention and other treaties.

Show the original quote (page 52)
„Asylrecht ist Menschenrecht. Wir lehnen alle bisherigen Asylrechtsverschärfungen ab.“

Translation: Asylum is a human right. We reject all previous tightening of asylum law.

Page 52 in the original

Placement

  • Europebalanced

    The party rejects the agreed common EU asylum system but at the same time demands uniform European protection standards.

  • Migrationclearly open

    Reversing the tightening, ending border checks and dropping safe-country rules would fundamentally loosen current asylum law.

Create legal escape routes and open immigration law

The Left wants safe and legal routes into the EU and would lift the visa requirement for people seeking protection. Climate impacts, environmental damage and poverty should also count as reasons for flight. Immigration law should no longer be based on origin or economic usefulness.

People fleeing should be able to reach the EU safely and legally. They should not need a visa for that. Poverty and climate damage should also count as reasons to flee. Places that take in refugees should get EU money.

The plan includes humanitarian visas and large admission quotas through the UN refugee agency's resettlement program. A European refugee levy would give EU funds to countries, regions and cities that take in more refugees and care for them well. The party wants broad visa liberalization and regards migration for social and economic reasons as legitimate too. It calls for improvements to family reunification. It rejects agreements with countries of origin and transit that serve to seal off Europe and ease deportations. In the party's view, legal routes take away smugglers' business.

Show the original quote (page 53)
„Es braucht umfassende Aufnahmekontingente über das Resettlement-Programm des UNHCR und die Aufhebung des Visumszwangs für Schutzsuchende.“

Translation: What is needed are extensive admission quotas through the UNHCR resettlement program and the lifting of the visa requirement for people seeking protection.

Page 53 in the original

Placement

  • Europeleaning more EU

    A European refugee levy paid from EU funds expands joint financing at EU level.

  • Migrationclearly open

    Visa-free entry for people seeking protection and new grounds for flight would fundamentally widen access compared with today.

Expand voting rights, naturalization and right to stay

The Left wants to give everyone who lives in Germany long-term the right to vote at all levels. After five years in the country, people would have a legal claim to citizenship regardless of income. People without secure residence status should be able to stay.

People who live in Germany for a long time should be allowed to vote. After five years, everyone should be able to become German. That should not depend on money. Children born here should be German right away.

Voting rights would include both voting and standing for election. All children born in Germany would receive citizenship. The party welcomes that multiple citizenship is now allowed but criticizes the income requirements. Undocumented people would get paths to legal status, and people living on repeated temporary toleration permits would get an effective right to stay. Residence and work permits would no longer be tied to an employer or length of employment, and foreign qualifications would be recognized faster.

Show the original quote (page 53)
„Nach fünf Jahren Aufenthalt in der Bundesrepublik soll jeder einen Rechtsanspruch auf Einbürgerung haben.“

Translation: After five years of residence in the Federal Republic, everyone should have a legal right to naturalization.

Page 53 in the original

Placement

  • Migrationclearly open

    Voting rights for non-citizens, citizenship by birth and legalization do not exist in this form today and would fundamentally expand immigrants' rights.

Reject deportations

The Left rejects deportations, especially to countries marked by war, persecution and misery. Deportation should also not be used as an additional punishment for offenders.

The Left is against deportations. Nobody should have to go back to a country with war or hardship. Offenders should not be deported either. They should get their punishment in Germany.

The platform describes deporting convicted people as a form of double punishment. Anyone who commits a crime should get a regular criminal trial in Germany regardless of residence status. Any prison sentence should also be served in Germany.

Show the original quote (page 53)
„Abschiebungen, insbesondere in Krieg, Verfolgung und Elend oder als Form der Doppelbestrafung, lehnen wir ab.“

Translation: We reject deportations, especially into war, persecution and misery or as a form of double punishment.

Page 53 in the original

Placement

  • Migrationclearly open

    Largely giving up deportations, including of offenders, would fundamentally change current practice.

What do the other parties say on migration and integration?

All programs at federal level compared