Skip to content
parteiprogramm

Linke on public safety

From the program “Everyone wants to govern. We want change.”

2025 federal election, February 23, 2025Original PDF, 60 pagesAnalyzed on October 2, 2026

AIThe summaries and placements on this page were written by AI. No person reviews each one. How they are made

Placement on Public safety

Average of the points on this page. The placement is made by AI.

Each axis measures one topic. There is no single "left" or "right" for everything here: economy, society, migration and security are kept apart. Only what the program says is placed. How to read the placement

  • Civil liberties and securityclearly civil liberties first (-1.7), from 3 points

    Points per step: 2 clearly civil liberties first, 1 leaning civil liberties first, 0 balanced, 0 leaning security and order first, 0 clearly security and order first

The small columns under the bars show how many points sit on each of the five steps.

Replace domestic intelligence with a monitoring office

The Left wants to abolish the domestic intelligence service (Verfassungsschutz) and replace it with an independent monitoring office. As a first step, the system of paid informants would be exposed and ended.

The Verfassungsschutz is a secret service inside Germany. The Left wants to abolish it. An independent office should replace it. First, the secret informants should go.

The new office would monitor authoritarianism and group-focused hostility. Informants are recruited from within the scenes being watched; the platform sees entanglements with the far right among them. Their use would be investigated and stopped as a first step.

Show the original quote (page 49)
„Wir wollen den Verfassungsschutz durch eine unabhängige Beobachtungsstelle zu „Autoritarismus und gruppenbezogener Menschenfeindlichkeit“ ersetzen.“

Translation: We want to replace the Verfassungsschutz with an independent monitoring office on "authoritarianism and group-focused hostility."

Page 49 in the original

Placement

  • Civil liberties and securityclearly civil liberties first

    An intelligence service and its powers would be abolished and replaced by an office without intelligence tools.

Roll back surveillance and enforce data protection

The Left rejects data retention, state spyware and blanket video surveillance and wants to ban biometric surveillance and chat scanning. In its view, more surveillance and tougher criminal laws do not bring more security.

The Left wants less surveillance. The state should not store data just in case. Cameras should not be allowed to recognize faces. The state should not check private chats.

The party also rejects subscriber data requests, dragnet searches, non-individualized cell tower queries and eavesdropping operations. The anti-terror laws of the past 30 years would be reviewed from a civil rights perspective. It opposes checks based on skin color, religion, language or origin, as well as occupational bans, preventive detention and loyalty clauses for public grants. Instead, criminal police and prosecutors would be better equipped for economic and cyber crime; large events would need plans against sexualized violence.

Show the original quote (page 49)
„Biometrische Videoüberwachung und Chat-Kontrollen wollen wir verbieten.“

Translation: We want to ban biometric video surveillance and chat scanning.

Page 49 in the original

Placement

  • Civil liberties and securityclearly civil liberties first

    Numerous existing investigative powers such as remote device searches and subscriber data requests would end and new surveillance be banned.

Identify police officers and demilitarize the police

The Left demands that police officers be individually identifiable and rejects equipping police with military weapons, tasers and rubber bullets. At the same time, police training and working conditions are to improve.

Every police officer should wear an ID mark. Then people can identify the officer. Police should not use tasers or rubber bullets. Pepper spray should be banned at demonstrations.

Operation logs and police videos would be stored with trustee offices to help investigate misconduct. The party rejects machine guns, armored vehicles and explosives for police; special tactical units should not be deployed at demonstrations. Pepper spray would be sharply restricted and banned at assemblies and events. Berlin's participation law would be adopted federally to bring more people with a migration background into the federal police. Psychological support for officers would improve, and disadvantages for eastern German officers would be removed.

Show the original quote (page 49)
„Wir fordern eine individuelle Kennzeichnungspflicht von Politist*innen.“

Translation: We call for an individual identification requirement for police officers.

Page 49 in the original

Placement

  • Civil liberties and securityleaning civil liberties first

    Police equipment would be restricted and oversight strengthened through identification and trustee offices.

What do the other parties say on public safety?

All programs at federal level compared