Skip to content
parteiprogramm

Freie Wähler on migration and integration

From the program “Responsibility for Germany”

2025 federal election, February 23, 2025Original PDF, 114 pagesAnalyzed on October 2, 2026

AIThe summaries and placements on this page were written by AI. No person reviews each one. How they are made

Placement on Migration and integration

Average of the points on this page. The placement is made by AI.

Each axis measures one topic. There is no single "left" or "right" for everything here: economy, society, migration and security are kept apart. Only what the program says is placed. How to read the placement

  • Economyleaning more market (+1), from 1 point

    Points per step: 0 clearly more state, 0 leaning more state, 0 balanced, 1 leaning more market, 0 clearly more market

  • Civil liberties and securityleaning security and order first (+1), from 1 point

    Points per step: 0 clearly civil liberties first, 0 leaning civil liberties first, 0 balanced, 1 leaning security and order first, 0 clearly security and order first

  • Europeleaning more EU (-0.7), from 3 points

    Points per step: 0 clearly more EU, 2 leaning more EU, 1 balanced, 0 leaning less EU, 0 clearly less EU

  • Migrationleaning restrictive (+1.3), from 10 points

    Points per step: 0 clearly open, 1 leaning open, 1 balanced, 2 leaning restrictive, 6 clearly restrictive

The small columns under the bars show how many points sit on each of the five steps.

Let refugees in training stay

The Free Voters want refugees to be able to finish their vocational training and then work for two years before their residence status is reassessed. This is meant to give businesses planning certainty.

Some refugees are doing vocational training. The Free Voters want them to be allowed to finish it. After that they should be able to work for two years. Only then does the state check again whether they may stay.

The rule would apply to refugees who are willing to integrate and to work hard. Their residence status would be reviewed only after they complete training and two years of practical work. If the review is then negative, the person keeps the training, which the party describes as the best form of development aid.

Show the original quote (page 24)
„integrations- und leistungswillige Flüchtlinge ihre Ausbildung abschließen und eine zweijährige Praxiszeit absolvieren können, ehe ihr Aufenthaltsstatus neu bewertet wird“

Translation: refugees who are willing to integrate and perform can complete their training and a two-year period of practical work before their residence status is reassessed

Page 24 in the original

Placement

  • Migrationleaning open

    The stay of refugees in training would be secured for the apprenticeship and two years of work, which gradually strengthens options to remain.

Joint protection of EU external borders, national turn-backs

The Free Voters call for a joint European border force that secures the entire EU external border and turns back irregular migration. Until that works, the Federal Police are to turn people back at Germany's borders.

The Free Voters want a shared border force for Europe. It should protect the outer borders of the EU. All EU countries should pay for it. Until this works, the Federal Police should turn people back at German borders.

The force would be made up of contingents from EU member states and receive enough staff, equipment, and a suitable legal basis. Countries such as Italy and Greece are not to be left alone, and all member states would share the costs. The platform argues that this is the only way to avoid permanent checks at internal borders. As an interim step it calls for targeted turn-backs at the German border, also because neighboring states let migrants travel on.

Show the original quote (page 48)
„Wir fordern die Aufstellung einer leistungsfähigen gemeinsamen europäischen Grenzschutzeinheit, bestehend aus Kontingenten der Mitgliedstaaten.“

Translation: We call for the creation of a capable joint European border protection unit made up of contingents from the member states.

Page 48 in the original

Placement

  • Europeleaning more EU

    A jointly funded European border force expands a shared EU task.

  • Migrationclearly restrictive

    Turning back irregular migration at the EU's external borders and at German borders goes well beyond current practice.

Change the Dublin rules, reject redistribution

The Free Voters consider the Dublin system a failure and want it revised. They reject distributing refugees among EU states; instead, direct returns and refusals of entry should come first.

The Dublin rules say which EU country handles an asylum claim. The Free Voters want to change these rules. Refugees should not be shared out among EU countries. They should rather be sent back. Germany should make its rules stricter.

The platform aims for a European solution and demands that Germany tighten its migration rules and align them with European law. The EU itself is to solve the problem instead of leaving it to individual states. If necessary, the EU would run and pay for reception and return centers near the external borders. The platform also considers an asylum claim misplaced when someone has already passed through several safe countries.

Show the original quote (page 49)
„Eine Umverteilung von Flüchtlingen innerhalb der Union lehnen wir ab.“

Translation: We reject a redistribution of refugees within the Union.

Page 49 in the original

Placement

  • Europebalanced

    The EU is to run and fund return centers itself, while a shared distribution among member states is rejected.

  • Migrationleaning restrictive

    Tighter German rules and priority for returns and refusals shift asylum policy in a restrictive direction.

Link sea rescue to immediate return

The Free Voters want to prevent people from drowning in the Mediterranean while having those rescued taken back while still at sea where possible. Private sea rescue is to be placed under EU border protection command or stopped.

No one should drown in the Mediterranean. Smuggler boats should not set out at all. Rescued people should be taken back quickly. Private rescue ships should follow EU border guards. Otherwise they should no longer be allowed to operate.

The first priority is to stop smuggler boats from setting out. States from whose coasts the boats depart and that do not cooperate on taking people back are to face tangible sanctions. If the route can be proven, for example by satellite images or drones, the return is to be enforced. Organized civilian rescue would be integrated into the command structure of European border protection or halted.

Show the original quote (page 49)
„dass – wo immer möglich – eine umgehende Rückführung der Flüchtlinge noch auf See durch den EU-Außengrenzschutz erfolgt.“

Translation: that – wherever possible – refugees are returned immediately while still at sea by EU external border protection.

Page 49 in the original

Placement

  • Migrationclearly restrictive

    Returns while still at sea and the possible halting of civilian sea rescue would be a fundamental tightening compared with today.

Manage immigration by need, require integration

The Free Voters want immigration to follow the needs of European countries and to recruit workers in a targeted way. Integration is to follow the principle of support paired with obligations.

The Free Voters want immigration based on need. People should come for certain jobs. Immigrants should learn German. They should accept democracy. The state should support them in this.

Recruitment is to be open and transparent for specific occupations, regions, or cities, with the ability to integrate also playing a role. Countries of origin should, where possible, not be weakened by the departure of well-educated people. The platform names German language skills, willingness to gain job qualifications, and acceptance of the free democratic order as essential for integration. The state is to provide support for this and counter the emergence of parallel societies.

Show the original quote (page 50)
„Die nötige Immigration muss in Europa neu strukturiert werden und sich nach dem Bedarf der europäischen Länder richten.“

Translation: The necessary immigration must be restructured in Europe and be guided by the needs of the European countries.

Page 50 in the original

Placement

  • Migrationbalanced

    The point combines targeted recruitment of workers with needs-based control and integration duties, taking no clear side.

Limit migration into the welfare system

The Free Voters want to prevent EU freedom of movement from leading to immigration into the German welfare system. Travel by non-EU benefit recipients is to be registered, and asylum seekers who voluntarily travel home would permanently lose their entitlements.

The Free Voters want less abuse of welfare benefits. A register should record trips by non-EU citizens who get benefits. Some asylum seekers travel to their home country by choice. They should then get no more support. This should apply forever.

The platform argues that all EU states are themselves obliged to provide social protection, so no one is left unprotected and false incentives disappear. For people without EU citizenship who receive benefits in Germany, a register would record every entry and exit. Security, welfare, and justice authorities would have access to it. A further demand is that the federal government cover all costs of immigration, integration, and deportation in order to relieve municipalities.

Show the original quote (page 50)
„Wer als Asylbewerber freiwillig in sein Herkunftsland ausreist, dessen Ausreise ist zu dokumentieren und er verliert dauerhaft den Anspruch auf Unterstützung und Sozialleistungen.“

Translation: Anyone who, as an asylum seeker, voluntarily travels to their country of origin is to have that departure documented and permanently loses the entitlement to support and social benefits.

Page 50 in the original

Placement

  • Economyleaning more market

    Access to social benefits is to be restricted for certain groups.

  • Migrationleaning restrictive

    A travel register and the permanent loss of benefits after a trip home tighten conditions for immigrants.

Deport or detain dangerous individuals and foreign offenders

The Free Voters demand that people classified as security threats and refugees who have committed crimes be deported or detained immediately. Anyone who commits serious or repeated offenses is to be made to leave Germany quickly.

Some people are seen by police as a serious threat. The Free Voters want to deport or lock them up at once. This should also apply to refugees who commit crimes. Some cannot be deported. They should be held in deportation detention.

If someone cannot be deported because of missing papers or because the country of origin will not take them back, they are to be treated as a security risk and placed in deportation detention. Deportations are to be carried out so that a return is not to be expected; agreements with safe third countries are to be negotiated for this. Serious offenders are to remain in custody or be handed over into custody. Which countries count as safe third countries is to be defined uniformly across the EU.

Show the original quote (page 51)
„Deshalb fordern wir die sofortige Abschiebung oder Inhaftierung von Gefährdern und in unserem Land straffälligen Flüchtlingen.“

Translation: We therefore demand the immediate deportation or detention of dangerous individuals and of refugees who have committed crimes in our country.

Page 51 in the original

Placement

  • Civil liberties and securityleaning security and order first

    Detention of people classified as a security risk extends the state's coercive powers in favor of security.

  • Migrationclearly restrictive

    Immediate deportation and deportation detention even for people who cannot be deported go fundamentally beyond current residence law.

Make naturalization harder and anchor it in the constitution

The Free Voters want to write naturalization rules into the Basic Law so they can only be changed by a two-thirds majority. Naturalization would be possible after seven years at the earliest, and dual citizenship with non-EU countries would remain the exception.

The Free Voters want stricter rules for German citizenship. People should get it after 7 years at the earliest. They need good German for this. Two passports should be rare. The rules should be in the constitution.

The platform justifies anchoring the rules in the constitution by saying that naturalization and voting law are fundamental to living together and can so far be changed by a simple majority. Requirements for naturalization would be good language skills, proven loyalty to the constitution, and demonstrated integration. Dual passports with countries outside the EU would be allowed only in a few individually justified cases. Immigrants and stateless people could receive travel documents before naturalization but would not be allowed to vote.

Show the original quote (page 52)
„Der Mindestzeitraum für die Verleihung der Staatsbürgerschaft darf 7 Jahre nicht unterschreiten“

Translation: The minimum period for granting citizenship must not be less than 7 years

Page 52 in the original

Placement

  • Migrationclearly restrictive

    The waiting period would rise from five years today to at least seven, and the dual citizenship generally permitted since 2024 would largely be rolled back.

Asylum centers outside the EU and EU return agreements

The Free Voters want asylum applications examined in centers beyond the EU's external borders, where applicants stay during the procedure. In addition, the EU is to conclude readmission agreements with countries of origin jointly. The platform calls fast procedures and the return of rejected asylum seekers essential.

The Free Voters want asylum requests checked outside the EU. There should be centers there for this. People wait there for the decision. The EU should pay for the centers. The EU should also make deals with home countries. Then rejected people can return more easily.

EU staff would process applications quickly in the centers; the facilities are to meet minimum humanitarian standards, respect human dignity and be paid for from EU funds. Instead of separate deals by each member state, the EU is to push readmission agreements. Cooperating countries of origin would get preferential treatment in European development cooperation and economically, with money going only to vetted projects and organizations. Countries that do not cooperate are to face sanctions.

Show the original quote (page 59)
„Wir stehen für Aufnahmezentren außerhalb der europäischen Außengrenzen, an denen Mitarbeiter der Europäischen Union die Asylanträge prüfen, während die Antragssteller dort verweilen.“

Translation: We stand for reception centers outside Europe's external borders where European Union staff examine asylum applications while the applicants stay there.

Page 59 in the original

Placement

  • Europeleaning more EU

    Asylum processing, funding of the centers and readmission agreements are to lie with the EU more than today.

  • Migrationclearly restrictive

    Examining asylum claims outside the EU would fundamentally rebuild today's asylum system toward restriction and returns.

Allow asylum claims only in the first safe third country

The Free Voters want asylum to be claimable only in the first safe third country, and thus generally not in Germany. Anyone entering illegally or with smugglers would be barred from permanent residence. Legal entry routes are to be created for recruited immigrants to undercut the smugglers' business.

The Free Voters want to fight smugglers. Smugglers take people across borders illegally for money. People who enter illegally should not be allowed to stay for good. People should only ask for asylum in the first safe country. That is usually not Germany. There should be legal ways for recruited people.

In countries of origin, it is to be communicated forcefully that illegal border crossing and smuggling rule out permanent residence in Germany. Only people who arrive legally and through recruitment would have a long-term prospect. For people in need of protection, the platform envisions solutions in the region of origin, secured militarily under a UN mandate if necessary. The party also regards refugee centers in third countries as a pragmatic route.

Show the original quote (page 60)
„Asylanträge sollen immer nur im ersten sicheren Drittland gestellt werden dürfen, daher in aller Regel nicht in Deutschland.“

Translation: Asylum applications should only ever be allowed to be filed in the first safe third country, and therefore as a rule not in Germany.

Page 60 in the original

Placement

  • Migrationclearly restrictive

    Asylum claims in Germany would generally be ruled out and illegal entrants denied a prospect of staying, fundamentally restricting today's asylum law.

What do the other parties say on migration and integration?

All programs at federal level compared