Skip to content
parteiprogramm

Linke on the environment and animal welfare

From the program “Everyone wants to govern. We want change.”

2025 federal election, February 23, 2025Original PDF, 60 pagesAnalyzed on October 2, 2026

AIThe summaries and placements on this page were written by AI. No person reviews each one. How they are made

Placement on Environment and animal welfare

Average of the points on this page. The placement is made by AI.

Each axis measures one topic. There is no single "left" or "right" for everything here: economy, society, migration and security are kept apart. Only what the program says is placed. How to read the placement

  • Economyleaning more state (-1.2), from 4 points

    Points per step: 1 clearly more state, 3 leaning more state, 0 balanced, 0 leaning more market, 0 clearly more market

  • Climateclearly climate first (-2), from 1 point

    Points per step: 1 clearly climate first, 0 leaning climate first, 0 balanced, 0 leaning growth first, 0 clearly growth first

The small columns under the bars show how many points sit on each of the five steps.

Ban food waste

The Left wants to ban throwing away edible food. By 2030, the amount of food waste is to be cut in half.

The Left wants to ban throwing good food in the trash. Stores should donate the food or give it away. By 2030 there should be only half as much food waste.

Food that is still edible is to go to nonprofit organizations or be handed out directly for free. The goal is to halve the amount of waste by 2030. The platform calls for binding requirements that differ by industry.

Show the original quote (page 6)
„Der Umfang der Lebensmittelabfälle soll bis 2030 halbiert werden.“

Translation: The volume of food waste is to be halved by 2030.

Page 6 in the original

Placement

  • Economyleaning more state

    Businesses would face new binding requirements and a duty to give food away, i.e. more regulation.

Resource protection act and stronger supply chain law

The Left wants a resource protection act and to rule out mining in protected areas and the deep sea. Local people are to share in mining projects and be able to reject them. A stricter supply chain law is meant to prevent exploitation in the Global South.

The Left wants a law to protect raw materials. There should be no mining in protected areas or the deep sea. Local people should be allowed to say no. Companies should be liable if their suppliers harm people or nature.

The right to have a say and to refuse is explicitly to apply to lithium mining in Saxony as well, and local people are to share in the value created. Environmental and drinking water protection is to be guaranteed worldwide. The program opposes what it sees as a looming green colonialism over raw materials for climate-friendly technology. The supply chain law is to get complaint channels for those affected and liability rules, and trade agreements are to include strong social and environmental standards.

Show the original quote (page 35)
„Wir wollen keinen Bergbau in Naturschutzgebieten, Trinkwasserschutzgebieten oder der Tiefsee.“

Translation: We want no mining in nature reserves, drinking water protection areas or the deep sea.

Page 35 in the original

Placement

  • Economyleaning more state

    Additional liability rules and mining bans tighten requirements for companies.

Expand the circular economy, ban waste exports

The Left wants to make products longer-lasting and repairable, recycle more and cut waste. Single-use packaging is to be largely banned, waste exports from the EU prohibited and waste disposal returned to public ownership.

Products should last longer and be repairable. There should be more recycling and less waste. Much single-use packaging should be banned. Waste should no longer leave the EU for other countries. Waste collection should be public again.

New ecodesign rules are to secure lifespan, updates and repairs; warranty periods are to follow product lifespan, and the reversed burden of proof is to rise to two years. Manufacturers are to pay for take-back, transport, reprocessing and disposal and pay levies on remaining single-use packaging. In the EU, the Left seeks a uniform deposit system for beverage bottles and wants to fight illegal shipping of electronic waste harder. Organic waste is to be fermented into biogas before composting. Private fireworks are to be reduced to protect people, animals and nature.

Show the original quote (page 35)
„Wir fordern höhere gesetzliche Recyclingquoten und höhere Einsatzquoten für wiederverwertete Stoffe.“

Translation: We demand higher statutory recycling quotas and higher quotas for the use of recycled materials.

Page 35 in the original

Placement

  • Economyclearly more state

    Bans, manufacturer levies and returning waste management to public ownership replace a market that is partly private today.

Double nature funding, secure protected areas and oceans

The Left wants to spend twice as much on nature-based climate protection, expand protected areas and restore damaged ecosystems. Nature would get rights of its own, water would stay in public hands, and the oceans would be better protected.

The Left wants twice as much money to protect nature. More land should be wilderness. People should be able to go to court on behalf of nature. Water should belong to everyone. The oceans should be better protected.

Five percent of land would become wilderness, and there would be an enforceable right to an intact environment plus broader rights for associations to sue. For industrial projects like Tesla in Grünheide, drinking water supply would take priority; restoring rivers, an action plan against low water levels, and reviving bogs and floodplain forests are planned. The UN High Seas Treaty would be ratified quickly and nearly a third of the world's oceans protected by 2030. Fishing would be regulated more strictly, deep-sea mining banned internationally and commercial whaling ended. A positive list would define which animals may be kept as pets.

Show the original quote (page 42)
„Die Mittel für natürlichen Klimaschutz müssen verdoppelt werden.“

Translation: Funding for nature-based climate protection must be doubled.

Page 42 in the original

Placement

  • Economyleaning more state

    Water would stay in public hands, with the common good taking priority over profit interests.

  • Climateclearly climate first

    Funding for nature-based climate protection would double, an increase of far more than a quarter.

Reform the Animal Welfare Act and end animal testing

The Left wants to overhaul the Animal Welfare Act, enforce it more strictly and add tougher penalties. The party sees animals as sentient beings whose protection should take priority over profit. A phaseout of animal testing and several bans are also planned.

Animals should be better protected. People who abuse animals should be punished harder. One federal official should focus only on animal welfare. Animal testing should end step by step. Fur and wild animals in circuses should be banned.

An independent federal animal welfare commissioner would take part in lawmaking, and animal welfare groups would be strengthened. Severely harmful animal experiments would end at once, with a phaseout plan for the rest. Fur production and imports, dolphinariums, wild animals in circuses, animals at fairs, breeding that causes suffering and medically unnecessary procedures would be banned. The animal trade would be strictly regulated and illegal wildlife trade fought. Standards for keeping animals in zoos, businesses and homes would be geared to the animals, and wildlife corridors are meant to reduce collisions.

Show the original quote (page 43)
„Wir setzen uns für eine umfassende Reformierung des Tierschutzgesetzes ein.“

Translation: We are committed to a comprehensive reform of the Animal Welfare Act.

Page 43 in the original

Placement

This point touches none of the axes.

What do the other parties say on the environment and animal welfare?

All programs at federal level compared