Skip to content
parteiprogramm

Linke on agriculture

From the program “Everyone wants to govern. We want change.”

2025 federal election, February 23, 2025Original PDF, 60 pagesAnalyzed on October 2, 2026

AIThe summaries and placements on this page were written by AI. No person reviews each one. How they are made

Placement on Agriculture

Average of the points on this page. The placement is made by AI.

Each axis measures one topic. There is no single "left" or "right" for everything here: economy, society, migration and security are kept apart. Only what the program says is placed. How to read the placement

  • Economyleaning more state (-1.5), from 4 points

    Points per step: 2 clearly more state, 2 leaning more state, 0 balanced, 0 leaning more market, 0 clearly more market

  • Civil liberties and securityleaning civil liberties first (-1), from 1 point

    Points per step: 0 clearly civil liberties first, 1 leaning civil liberties first, 0 balanced, 0 leaning security and order first, 0 clearly security and order first

  • Climateleaning climate first (-1), from 1 point

    Points per step: 0 clearly climate first, 1 leaning climate first, 0 balanced, 0 leaning growth first, 0 clearly growth first

The small columns under the bars show how many points sit on each of the five steps.

Protect farmers from corporate power and land speculation

The Left wants to curb the market power of slaughterhouse, dairy and retail corporations and build up regional processing and marketing. Minimum producer prices, tougher antitrust law and a farm structure law against land speculation are meant to secure farmers a decent income.

Farmers often earn too little. Big companies have a lot of power. The Left wants minimum prices for farmers. Farmland should not go to investors. More food should come from the region.

Monopolies would be broken up, and price monitors would be able to step in. Collective agreements would apply across farming, forestry and fishing, with minimum wage and social insurance for seasonal workers too. The farm structure law would strengthen communal and public land ownership. Domestic standards would be shielded from cheap imports; the party is critical of free trade agreements and calls for clear origin labeling and state regional labels. Subsidy applications would be simplified and digitized EU-wide.

Show the original quote (page 41)
„Wo es nötig ist, wollen wir mit Mindesterzeugerpreisen Landwirt*innen schützen.“

Translation: Where necessary, we want to protect farmers with minimum producer prices.

Page 41 in the original

Placement

  • Economyclearly more state

    State minimum prices, breaking up corporations and protection from imports intervene fundamentally in the farm market.

Halve pesticides, stop glyphosate and GM crop cultivation

The Left wants to cut pesticide use at least in half by 2030 and ban glyphosate and neonicotinoids. Genetically modified crops should not be grown, and patents on life would be prohibited.

Farmers should use far fewer pesticides. Some, like glyphosate, should be banned. Plants with altered genes should not be grown. No one should get a patent on living things.

New genetic engineering methods such as gene editing would be controlled as strictly as older methods. The party demands transparency and strict rules for approving pesticides. A pesticide reduction strategy and alternatives to conventional fertilizers are meant to help farms with the ecological transition.

Show the original quote (page 42)
„Bis 2030 soll der Einsatz von Pflanzenschutzmitteln um mindestens 50 Prozent verringert werden.“

Translation: By 2030, the use of pesticides is to be reduced by at least 50 percent.

Page 42 in the original

Placement

  • Economyleaning more state

    New bans and stricter approval rules increase regulation of the farm sector.

Tie livestock numbers to land and reduce herds

The Left wants to link the number of farm animals to a farm's land area and thereby reduce livestock numbers in Germany. The transition should be socially fair and serve animal welfare, climate and environment; less over-fertilization is meant to relieve water bodies.

A farm should keep only as many animals as its land can support. Then Germany has fewer farm animals. Animals should live better. Long animal transports should be banned. Very large meat plants should close.

The platform sets a cap of 1.5 livestock units per hectare. High minimum standards would apply to all species, and the federal government would give more support for converting barns for animal welfare. Live animals would be transported for no more than four hours; slaughter would be decentralized and without piece-rate pay. More frequent unannounced inspections and tougher penalties for animal welfare violations are planned. The party wants to shut down large meat plants.

Show the original quote (page 42)
„Statt Megaställen wollen wir für das Wohl von Menschen und Tieren eine flächengebundene Tierhaltung (maximal 1,5 Großvieheinheiten pro Hektar)“

Translation: Instead of mega-barns, we want land-based livestock farming (a maximum of 1.5 livestock units per hectare) for the well-being of people and animals

Page 42 in the original

Placement

  • Economyclearly more state

    A fixed cap on animals per area and closing large meat plants would fundamentally restructure the industry.

  • Climateleaning climate first

    Smaller herds are explicitly justified by climate and environmental protection and enforced through new rules.

Drop VAT on staple foods, label food better

The Left wants to ensure healthy, affordable food for all. Staple foods and plant-based substitutes would be exempt from VAT, with checks to make sure shoppers get the savings. Also planned are a state label, advertising bans for unhealthy food, and decriminalizing dumpster diving.

Basic foods should be sold without VAT. That makes food cheaper. A state label should show how good a food product is. Ads for unhealthy food should be banned. Taking food from store trash bins should no longer be a crime.

Plant-based alternatives to meat and dairy would count as staple foods. The uniform label would cover climate, environment, animal welfare, health and social aspects; results of more frequent food inspections would go online, and for serious violations on the store door as well. The ad ban targets children and teenagers above all, and sugar in soft drinks would be capped. Public institutions would buy regional and eco-friendly food with state subsidies. Wasting food and speculating on food would be banned.

Show the original quote (page 42)
„Wir fordern eine Abschaffung der Mehrwertsteuer auf Grundnahrungsmittel sowie wirksame Kontrollen, sodass die Steuersenkung an die Verbraucher*innen weitergegeben wird“

Translation: We call for abolishing VAT on staple foods as well as effective checks so that the tax cut is passed on to consumers

Page 42 in the original

Placement

  • Economyleaning more state

    Price checks, ad bans, a state label and subsidies expand state intervention, even though a consumption tax is dropped.

  • Civil liberties and securityleaning civil liberties first

    Taking discarded food would no longer be punishable.

What do the other parties say on agriculture?

All programs at federal level compared