Skip to content
parteiprogramm

Linke on the economy

From the program “Everyone wants to govern. We want change.”

2025 federal election, February 23, 2025Original PDF, 60 pagesAnalyzed on October 2, 2026

AIThe summaries and placements on this page were written by AI. No person reviews each one. How they are made

Placement on Economy

Average of the points on this page. The placement is made by AI.

Each axis measures one topic. There is no single "left" or "right" for everything here: economy, society, migration and security are kept apart. Only what the program says is placed. How to read the placement

  • Economyclearly more state (-1.7), from 11 points

    Points per step: 8 clearly more state, 3 leaning more state, 0 balanced, 0 leaning more market, 0 clearly more market

  • Climateleaning climate first (-1), from 2 points

    Points per step: 0 clearly climate first, 2 leaning climate first, 0 balanced, 0 leaning growth first, 0 clearly growth first

The small columns under the bars show how many points sit on each of the five steps.

Break the market power of supermarket chains

The Left wants to curb the power of large food and retail corporations with tougher antitrust law and break up monopolies. Speculation on food is to be banned. Farmers and consumers are meant to benefit.

A few big supermarket chains have a lot of power. The Left wants to limit that power. Companies that are too big should be split up. Nobody should be allowed to speculate on food. Farmers should get minimum prices where needed.

The platform calls for fair supply relationships and effective antitrust law in the food market. It notes that the Federal Cartel Office has long viewed the chains' buying and market power critically. No single chain should dominate a region, and monopolies are to be dissolved. Price monitors should be able to step in. Where needed, minimum producer prices are to protect farmers. In the party's view, corporations use inflation to raise their profits.

Show the original quote (page 6)
„Keine Region darf von einzelnen Supermarktketten dominiert werden. Monopole müssen zerschlagen werden und Preiswächter müssen durchgreifen können.“

Translation: No region may be dominated by individual supermarket chains. Monopolies must be broken up, and price monitors must be able to take decisive action.

Page 6 in the original

Placement

  • Economyclearly more state

    Breaking up corporations, banning speculation and setting minimum prices would be deep state interventions in the market.

Set up a government price watchdog

The Left wants to create an independent federal agency that monitors prices and can intervene quickly when key industries raise them sharply. In the energy sector, price increases would need approval.

A new agency should watch prices. It should warn early when prices rise too much. Then the state should be able to step in fast. Energy companies should need permission to raise prices.

The price watchdog would be an independent top-level federal agency and act as an early warning system. Intervention should be possible when corporations in sectors such as energy, housing, food, mobility, health or banking raise prices well beyond their cost increases. Energy suppliers would have to prove that higher procurement costs justify an increase. The platform argues that the previous coalition reacted too late and too weakly to the price surge.

Show the original quote (page 7)
„Wir fordern eine neue Preisaufsicht als Frühwarnsystem für die deutsche und Europäische Wirtschaft.“

Translation: We call for a new price watchdog as an early warning system for the German and European economy.

Page 7 in the original

Placement

  • Economyclearly more state

    A new agency with powers to intervene and mandatory approval for energy prices would introduce price controls that do not exist today.

Cap executive pay by law

The Left calls for a binding ceiling on the pay of managers and board members. It may be at most twenty times the lowest salary in the company.

Managers should not be able to earn unlimited amounts. The Left wants a fixed limit. A manager may get at most 20 times what the lowest-paid person in the company gets. Bonuses count too.

The limit would apply to managers and executive board members. Bonuses are included in the calculation. The benchmark is the lowest salary in the company concerned, of which no more than twenty times may be paid.

Show the original quote (page 11)
„Sie dürfen nicht mehr als das Zwanzigfache des niedrigsten Gehalts im Unternehmen bekommen.“

Translation: They may not receive more than twenty times the lowest salary in the company.

Page 11 in the original

Placement

  • Economyclearly more state

    There is no statutory pay ceiling today; it would be a new intervention in companies' freedom to set pay.

Tighten the Supply Chain Act

The Left wants to expand the Lieferkettengesetz (Supply Chain Act), which requires companies to respect human rights and environmental standards among their suppliers. Violations would be punished more severely.

Companies buy goods and parts in many countries. A law requires them to respect human rights when they do. The Left wants to make this law stricter. Companies should face tougher penalties if they break it.

The plan includes better options for lawsuits, complaint procedures and more frequent government inspections. The rules cover human rights, occupational health and safety, environmental and climate standards, and child labor. Sanctions would also apply internationally. Raw materials agreements with other countries would be designed so that sustainable value creation develops there.

Show the original quote (page 25)
„Das Lieferkettengesetz wollen wir stärken, statt es aufzuweichen.“

Translation: We want to strengthen the Supply Chain Act instead of watering it down.

Page 25 in the original

Placement

  • Economyleaning more state

    Existing obligations for companies would be extended and more strictly enforced.

Set up a 200 billion euro fund for industrial conversion

The Left calls for 200 billion euros for an investment fund that helps companies convert to climate-friendly production. Support is to come as long-term loans or in exchange for company shares. A binding future plan for the economy is to form the basis.

The Left wants 200 billion euros to rebuild industry. The money goes into a fund. Companies get loans from it. Or the state gets shares in the company in return. This should make industry climate-friendly.

Employees are to receive loans from the fund if they want to take over their company and run it as a cooperative, including in insolvency cases where continued operation looks viable. The fund is to reinvest returns from stakes and loans. The federal government is to draw up a future plan with conversion targets and investments together with unions, associations, researchers and companies, tied to job guarantees and collective agreements. The program also aims to convert the arms industry to civilian production, build regional economic cycles and make patents publicly usable. As its overarching goal it names democratic socialism.

Show the original quote (page 30)
„Das Geld fließt in einen Investitionsfonds, aus dem Unternehmen entweder mit langfristigen Krediten oder im Austausch für Gesellschaftsanteile beim klimagerechten Umbau unterstützt werden.“

Translation: The money goes into an investment fund from which companies are supported in climate-friendly conversion either with long-term loans or in exchange for company shares.

Page 30 in the original

Placement

  • Economyclearly more state

    A state fund of this size taking company stakes, plus a binding economic plan, would be a fundamentally more active role for the state.

  • Climateleaning climate first

    The fund is meant to speed up the climate-friendly conversion of industry with public money.

Tie state aid to job guarantees and collective agreements

The Left wants to grant state aid and subsidies only in return for binding commitments from companies. These include guarantees for employees, collective agreements, commitments to sites and investment plans. Funding is to be repaid if the conditions are broken.

Companies should only get state money in return for firm promises. They must protect jobs and pay union-agreed wages. They must keep their sites. Companies that break the promises pay the money back.

The condition applies to direct payments and indirect subsidies alike. Repayment is planned in cases of layoffs for operational reasons, broken job commitments or ignored environmental standards. Companies based in tax havens are to get no funding. Companies drawing on crisis aid are to be barred from paying dividends. Through public procurement, product standards and quotas, products made in a climate-friendly way under collective agreements are also to get an advantage, for example in steel.

Show the original quote (page 30)
„Dabei gilt: kein Steuergeld ohne Gegenleistung.“

Translation: The rule is: no tax money without something in return.

Page 30 in the original

Placement

  • Economyleaning more state

    Subsidies are tied to additional conditions for companies, tightening regulation.

Steer key industries through state shareholdings

The Left wants the federal government to buy stakes in important companies through industrial foundations and other forms of public ownership. This is meant to steer the climate-friendly conversion better and protect critical infrastructure from being sold off.

The federal government should buy shares in important companies. Industrial foundations should be set up for this. This lets the state steer the rebuilding of the economy. Important sites like ports or pipelines should not be sold.

The stakes are to come on top of the investment fund and be paid for by the federal government. As infrastructure worth protecting, the program lists refineries, pipelines, energy storage and ports, which should go neither to authoritarian states nor to private corporations. Public companies are to drive industrial renewal and involve private firms through cooperation.

Show the original quote (page 30)
„Finanziert durch den Bund, sollen gezielt Anteile an Unternehmen erworben werden, die eine Schlüsselrolle im Systemwechsel einnehmen.“

Translation: Financed by the federal government, stakes are to be acquired specifically in companies that play a key role in the system change.

Page 30 in the original

Placement

  • Economyclearly more state

    The state would deliberately become co-owner of key companies and steer industries publicly, which does not exist in this form today.

Give workforces a veto over company decisions

The Left wants to give works councils co-determination on economic matters. Workforces are to confirm major decisions and be able to veto relocations, closures and mass layoffs. In regions undergoing structural change, transformation councils are to help shape the conversion.

Workers should have more say in companies. Big decisions need the workers' approval. Workers should be able to stop closures and mass layoffs. In affected regions, councils should help decide on the changes.

The veto is also to apply to outsourcing and investments in the future. European works councils are to be strengthened so that sites of international corporations cannot be played off against each other. Collective employee ownership and employee-owned companies are to be promoted; the program cites studies saying more democratically run firms make more social and ecological decisions. The economic and transformation councils are to control money from the Climate and Transformation Fund. States, municipalities, companies, unions, works councils, employees and environmental and social associations are to have equal votes in them.

Show the original quote (page 31)
„Betriebsräte müssen in wirtschaftlichen Fragen ein Mitbestimmungsrecht bekommen und alle wichtigen Unternehmensentscheidungen müssen von Belegschaftsversammlungen bestätigt werden.“

Translation: Works councils must be given a right of co-determination on economic matters, and all major company decisions must be confirmed by workforce assemblies.

Page 31 in the original

Placement

  • Economyclearly more state

    A workforce veto over core company decisions would fundamentally restrict owners' control rights.

Convert the auto industry into a mobility industry

The Left wants to keep auto industry sites and jobs and convert the companies into mobility manufacturers that produce more for buses and rail. Plants the corporations want to give up are to be socialized. Electric mobility is to advance through public procurement, quotas and charging infrastructure.

The Left wants to keep jobs in the car industry. The companies should build more buses and trains. If a company wants to close a plant, the plant should become public property. The state should only buy electric cars. There should be more charging stations.

Public bodies are to buy only fully electric vehicles as a rule, starting immediately. At EU level, the Left seeks electric car quotas for commercial fleets. For tradespeople, care services and rural commuters, income-based subsidies for small electric vehicles are planned, and only vehicles built largely in the EU are to be subsidized. Added to this are investments in public charging points with low rates and requirements for gas stations, retailers and employers. When taken-over plants are converted, workforces are to be involved and collective agreements secured; the money comes from the industry fund. The program considers e-fuels and hydrogen impractical for private transport.

Show the original quote (page 32)
„Produktionsstätten, welche die Automobilindustrie aufgeben möchte, sollen vergesellschaftet und für die Bedarfe eines kollektiven Verkehrssystems umgerüstet werden.“

Translation: Production sites that the auto industry wants to give up are to be socialized and converted for the needs of a collective transport system.

Page 32 in the original

Placement

  • Economyclearly more state

    Socializing plants and state steering of the sector's conversion intervene fundamentally in ownership and the market.

  • Climateleaning climate first

    Quotas, procurement and charging infrastructure are meant to speed up the shift to electric mobility and collective transport.

Buy back privatized utilities with a federal fund

The Left calls for a federal fund that municipalities and states can use to bring privatized companies back into public ownership and run them on a nonprofit basis. Municipalities should carry out their tasks themselves instead of handing them to private providers.

Towns sold many companies in the past. The Left wants to bring them back. The federal government should give money for this. These companies should not work for profit.

The fund would be financed with federal money and be open to municipalities and states. Local energy suppliers and municipal housing companies should not have to make profits to plug budget gaps. So-called smart city technology should not remain a business model for large corporations but be put in citizens' hands.

Show the original quote (page 44)
„Wir fordern einen Rekommunalisierungsfonds aus Bundesmitteln, auf den Kommunen und Länder zurückgreifen können, um privatisierte Betriebe zurück in die öffentliche Hand zu holen und gemeinnützig zu betreiben.“

Translation: We call for a remunicipalization fund from federal money that municipalities and states can draw on to bring privatized companies back into public ownership and run them on a nonprofit basis.

Page 44 in the original

Placement

  • Economyclearly more state

    A new federal fund would reverse privatizations and move companies into public, nonprofit ownership.

Secure economic transformation in the East

The Left wants to accompany structural change in eastern Germany with investment plans, especially in regions with an auto industry. Workers would be protected through transitional employment companies and guaranteed incomes.

The economy in the East is changing. The Left wants investment plans for this change. New jobs should come from building trains. Workers should keep a secure income.

New jobs are to be created in building and maintaining rail vehicles. Economic and social councils would build on the eastern German tradition of round tables. Cooperatives, employee buyouts and municipal enterprises would be supported, among other things through an investment fund for industry. A solidarity-based training levy is meant to strengthen companies that train apprentices, especially small and mid-sized firms in rural areas.

Show the original quote (page 46)
„Verlässliche Investitionspläne müssen die wirtschaftliche Transformation absichern, speziell auch in den Autoregionen, und neue Arbeitsplätze im Bau und bei der Wartung von Schienenfahrzeugen schaffen.“

Translation: Reliable investment plans must secure the economic transformation, especially in the auto regions, and create new jobs in building and maintaining rail vehicles.

Page 46 in the original

Placement

  • Economyleaning more state

    The state would steer structural change through investment plans, income guarantees and support for cooperative and public enterprises.

What do the other parties say on the economy?

All programs at federal level compared