Skip to content
parteiprogramm

FDP on migration and integration

From the program “Everything Can Be Changed”

2025 federal election, February 23, 2025Original PDF, 52 pagesAnalyzed on October 2, 2026

AIThe summaries and placements on this page were written by AI. No person reviews each one. How they are made

Placement on Migration and integration

Average of the points on this page. The placement is made by AI.

Each axis measures one topic. There is no single "left" or "right" for everything here: economy, society, migration and security are kept apart. Only what the program says is placed. How to read the placement

  • Economyleaning more market (+1), from 1 point

    Points per step: 0 clearly more state, 0 leaning more state, 0 balanced, 1 leaning more market, 0 clearly more market

  • Europeleaning more EU (-1), from 1 point

    Points per step: 0 clearly more EU, 1 leaning more EU, 0 balanced, 0 leaning less EU, 0 clearly less EU

  • Migrationleaning restrictive (+0.8), from 4 points

    Points per step: 0 clearly open, 1 leaning open, 1 balanced, 0 leaning restrictive, 2 clearly restrictive

The small columns under the bars show how many points sit on each of the five steps.

Make labor immigration easier

The FDP wants to attract more workers from abroad and simplify procedures. All rules on immigration and asylum would be gathered in one legal code, and labor migrants would deal with only one agency. The Blue Card would also be open to skilled workers without a university degree.

The FDP wants more workers from abroad. They should deal with only one office. All rules should be in one law book. The Blue Card should cover more skilled workers. The Blue Card is an EU work permit.

For the single point of contact, the whole visa process would be reviewed. Minimum salary thresholds for the Blue Card would be dropped. The Western Balkans rule, which eases labor market access for people from those countries, would be expanded. Graduates of the world's 200 best universities would get a one-year job-search visa, as in the Netherlands. Well-integrated asylum seekers could switch to labor migration if they can support themselves and their families without public assistance.

Show the original quote (page 27)
„Die Europäische Blue Card wollen wir für weitere nicht-akademische Fachkräfte öffnen und die unpraktikablen Verdienstuntergrenzen abschaffen.“

Translation: We want to open the European Blue Card to further non-academic skilled workers and abolish the impractical minimum salary thresholds.

Page 27 in the original

Placement

  • Migrationleaning open

    Labor migration would become easier through a broader Blue Card, new visas and a track change, expanding immigration within the existing system.

Cut and restructure benefits for refugees

The FDP wants to take recognized refugees, including those from Ukraine, out of Bürgergeld (citizen's income) and give them a separate status. It would combine more help with finding work and lower benefits. People obliged to leave the country would generally get no more support.

The FDP wants to stop paying Bürgergeld to refugees. Bürgergeld is the basic welfare benefit. Refugees would get their own, lower benefit. They would get more help finding work. People who must leave would mostly get no money.

Refugees with a right to stay should be allowed to work as quickly as possible. The cut would go as far as the law permits; in the FDP's view, the benefit level must not create a wrong incentive. Rates for asylum seekers would also be reviewed and aligned across Europe in the long run. There would be more benefits in kind instead of cash, and the payment card would apply everywhere. Those who actively obstruct the clarification of their identity would also lose benefits.

Show the original quote (page 28)
„Wir Freie Demokraten wollen für alle anerkannten Flüchtlinge – dazu gehören auch die ukrainischen Geflüchteten – einen neuen sozialrechtlichen Status statt des Bezugs von Bürgergeld schaffen.“

Translation: We Free Democrats want to create a new social-law status for all recognized refugees – including Ukrainian refugees – instead of receiving Bürgergeld.

Page 28 in the original

Placement

  • Economyleaning more market

    Lower welfare benefits and stronger work incentives reduce state transfers.

  • Migrationclearly restrictive

    Recognized refugees would be moved from Bürgergeld into a new status with lower benefits, and people obliged to leave would lose support.

Limit irregular migration, centralize deportations

The FDP wants people without a right to stay to leave Germany quickly and wants to concentrate responsibility for deportations at the federal level. Family reunification for people with subsidiary protection would be suspended. Turning people back at the borders would be tested as a pilot.

The FDP wants to limit migration without permission. The federal government should handle deportations. Some refugees could not bring their families for now. The FDP wants to test turning people back at the border. Asylum procedures should be faster.

According to the platform, returns fail too often at the enforcement stage in the states. Asylum and court proceedings would be sped up and could also take place in third countries if safety and the rule of law are guaranteed there. More countries would be classified as safe countries of origin, and admission programs would be paused. At the EU level, Frontex would be strengthened in border protection and against smugglers; agreements would push countries of origin to take people back. Germany would also conclude its own migration partnerships.

Show the original quote (page 28)
„Den Familiennachzug zu subsidiär Schutzberechtigten wollen wir aussetzen und Aufnahmeprogramme pausieren.“

Translation: We want to suspend family reunification for people with subsidiary protection and pause admission programs.

Page 28 in the original

Placement

  • Europeleaning more EU

    A stronger role for Frontex and EU migration agreements rely on more joint European action.

  • Migrationclearly restrictive

    Family reunification would be suspended, admission programs paused, border rejections tested and asylum procedures moved to third countries, clearly restricting the current situation.

Reform integration courses, keep conditions for citizenship

The FDP wants to separate language courses from integration courses and review how well the existing courses work. Citizenship should come only after successful integration and stay tied to earning one's own living and accepting the values of the constitution.

The FDP wants to split language courses and integration courses. The courses should mainly prepare people for work. Only well-integrated people should get a German passport. They must earn their own money.

The platform considers the current combination of both course types costly and ineffective. Language courses are to be modular and grouped by ability, with the main aim of preparing people for the job market. Both kinds of courses should be possible alongside a job. On naturalization, the FDP points out that it pushed through the requirement that applicants support themselves. Antisemitic, racist or xenophobic acts and motives, a criminal record, or rejecting constitutional values are to rule out citizenship.

Show the original quote (page 29)
„Insbesondere müssen wir Sprach- und Integrationskurse voneinander trennen, denn der derzeitige Ansatz hat sich als ineffektiv und kostspielig erwiesen.“

Translation: In particular, we must separate language and integration courses from each other, because the current approach has proven ineffective and costly.

Page 29 in the original

Placement

  • Migrationbalanced

    The courses are to become more effective while the strict naturalization conditions already in force are confirmed, which essentially keeps the current state.

What do the other parties say on migration and integration?

All programs at federal level compared