Skip to content
parteiprogramm

Freie Wähler on climate and energy

From the program “Responsibility for Germany”

2025 federal election, February 23, 2025Original PDF, 114 pagesAnalyzed on October 2, 2026

AIThe summaries and placements on this page were written by AI. No person reviews each one. How they are made

Placement on Climate and energy

Average of the points on this page. The placement is made by AI.

Each axis measures one topic. There is no single "left" or "right" for everything here: economy, society, migration and security are kept apart. Only what the program says is placed. How to read the placement

  • Economybalanced (-0.5), from 4 points

    Points per step: 0 clearly more state, 3 leaning more state, 0 balanced, 1 leaning more market, 0 clearly more market

  • Climatebalanced (-0.3), from 11 points

    Points per step: 0 clearly climate first, 5 leaning climate first, 4 balanced, 2 leaning growth first, 0 clearly growth first

The small columns under the bars show how many points sit on each of the five steps.

Continue support for bioenergy and biogas

The Free Voters want to amend the Renewable Energy Sources Act (EEG) and continue feed-in payments for electricity from bioenergy over the long term. Biogas production should grow. The platform calls bioenergy indispensable because it can supply power continuously.

Bioenergy is energy from plants and waste. The Free Voters want to keep paying support for this energy. There should be more biogas. But farmers should still grow enough food.

More residual materials from farming, trade, and industry would be approved for biogas plants, in line with European rules. Biogas plants should be expanded flexibly, partly because biomethane can replace natural gas. The balance between food and energy production on farmland should be maintained. Producers should be able to market their energy more easily. Landowners whose land is crossed by new power lines should receive ongoing, nationally uniform payments instead of a one-time payment.

Show the original quote (page 33)
„Wir fordern die langjährige Weiterführung einer wirtschaftlich tragbaren Einspeisevergütung.“

Translation: We call for the long-term continuation of an economically viable feed-in tariff.

Page 33 in the original

Placement

  • Economyleaning more state

    The state-guaranteed payment for bioenergy would continue for years, extending an existing subsidy.

  • Climateleaning climate first

    The expansion of a renewable energy source would be advanced with subsidies, which incrementally supports the energy transition.

Lower electricity prices and build gas power plants

The Free Voters want to cut electricity costs for households substantially and secure supply with about 20 gigawatts of additional power plant capacity, mainly hydrogen-ready gas plants. Climate measures should not place a disproportionate burden on households or small and mid-sized businesses.

Electricity is very expensive in Germany. The Free Voters want it to be cheaper. They want to build new gas power plants. These deliver power when there is no wind or sun. Climate protection should not hit people with little money too hard.

The platform blames high prices on taxes and on what the party sees as poor management of the renewables build-out. Alongside expanding renewables as needed, base load and peak load are to be secured, including during periods without wind and sun. The Kraftwerkssicherheitsgesetz (power plant security act) is to move ahead quickly. Energy policy should take the situation of low earners into account. The energy transition should not be left to large utilities alone but involve citizens, businesses, regional suppliers and farmers.

Show the original quote (page 42)
„Hierfür sind entsprechende Kraftwerkskapazitäten zu sichern und zusätzlich aufzubauen. Dies sind vor allem Gaskraftwerke, die künftig auch mit Wasserstoff betrieben werden können.“

Translation: For this, appropriate power plant capacity must be secured and additionally built. These are mainly gas power plants that can also be run on hydrogen in the future.

Page 42 in the original

Placement

  • Climateleaning growth first

    Affordability and supply security get priority, the burden of climate measures is to be limited and new gas plants built.

Base the building energy act on a full life-cycle balance

The Free Voters want to change how the Gebäudeenergiegesetz (building energy act) rates buildings so that construction materials, building work and disposal also count. They stand by the goal of climate neutrality, but a fixed target year should not be untouchable if the burdens become too high.

Today, what counts for buildings is mostly how much energy they use. The Free Voters also want to count the building materials. Wood should be rated better than concrete. Older people should not lose their home because of costly rules. The year for climate neutrality should be movable.

The party does not reject minimum energy-saving standards for new and existing buildings in principle but considers today's calculation too one-sided. Continued use of existing buildings is to be credited, as are wood and other alternative materials that store CO2. Gypsum and sand extraction should weigh more heavily in the assessment. Renovation rules should take into account the age of owners living in their own homes so that older people are not forced to move out. On the timeline for climate neutrality, the platform also wants to look at how other economies proceed.

Show the original quote (page 43)
„Die Energieeinsparung durch die Weiternutzung des Bestandes muss zusammen mit dem höheren Energiebedarf in die Berechnung einfließen.“

Translation: The energy saved by continuing to use existing buildings must be included in the calculation together with the higher energy demand.

Page 43 in the original

Placement

  • Climateleaning growth first

    The target year for climate neutrality is to be movable if burdens are too high, and renovation requirements are to be softened.

Strengthen local citizen energy and municipal heating grids

The Free Voters favor decentralized supply from renewable sources in which municipalities and citizens have a stake. Local heating grids with a monopoly position should not be privatized, and cooperatives of connected customers should get special support.

Energy should be produced locally, for example from wind and sun. Towns and citizens should share in the earnings. Heating grids should not go to private companies. Citizens should be able to join together and invest in heating grids themselves.

Funding should reflect regional differences in land and terrain so each region uses its strengths. For transmission grid expansion, the platform demands a detailed cost-benefit comparison from grid operators and the Bundesnetzagentur (federal network agency). Distribution grids, which take in 90 percent of decentralized plants, should get more political weight. Municipalities should be able to invest in heating grids regardless of their finances. Local heat supply is meant to reduce uncertainty among citizens by letting them become investors themselves or through their town.

Show the original quote (page 44)
„Wir setzen uns für die Steigerung des Selbstversorgungsgrades der Kommunen sowie für die Bürgerenergie ein.“

Translation: We are committed to increasing the degree of self-sufficiency of municipalities and to citizen energy.

Page 44 in the original

Placement

  • Economyleaning more state

    Heating grids are to stay in municipal or cooperative hands rather than be privatized, which strengthens public ownership.

  • Climateleaning climate first

    The local build-out of renewables is to be pushed forward to meet climate targets in the energy sector.

Enable flexible power rates, storage and bidirectional charging

The Free Voters want the power system to follow supply more closely: when electricity is plentiful, the price should fall so that consumption shifts. To that end they call for flexible rates, grid fees that reflect who causes the costs, more storage and bidirectional charging.

When there is a lot of electricity, it should be cheap. Then it pays to use power at that time. The Free Voters want more power storage. Electric cars should also be allowed to feed power back into the grid. This is called bidirectional charging.

Grid fees should assign costs as precisely as possible to those who use the grid, since today mainly those who cannot generate power themselves are paying. Investment in smart grids and controllable storage is meant to secure stability. Regionally produced power should be sold directly, for example through charging stations at wind farms. Laws that currently prevent bidirectional charging are to be changed. Pumped-storage plants are also considered useful if environmentally sound, and expanding distribution grids is to secure supply despite the coal and nuclear phase-out.

Show the original quote (page 45)
„Das bedeutet, wenn viel Strom da ist, muss er preiswert abgegeben werden, damit es sich lohnt, den Verbrauch so weit wie möglich in die Niedrigpreis-Phasen zu verlegen.“

Translation: This means that when a lot of electricity is available, it must be sold cheaply so that it pays to shift consumption as far as possible into the low-price phases.

Page 45 in the original

Placement

  • Economyleaning more market

    Price signals, direct marketing and the removal of legal barriers are meant to steer the power market more through competition.

  • Climateleaning climate first

    Renewables and storage are to be expanded quickly and integrated better into the grid.

Secure climate-neutral base load with biomass and nuclear research

The Free Voters want base-load power to become climate-neutral as soon as possible. All forms of renewable generation, including biogas and biomass, are to be expanded. The party also counts on hydrogen and on further scientific development of nuclear power and nuclear fusion.

Germany always needs a basic amount of electricity. This should soon be produced without harming the climate. The Free Voters want more biogas and biomass for this. They also want research on hydrogen, nuclear power and nuclear fusion.

The platform calls for a strong expansion of all renewable generation types across the country. Biogas is seen as an important complement because its output can be controlled, and the party says it has been neglected lately. Waste and residual materials and improved crop cultivation are meant to better its environmental footprint without harming biodiversity. Base-load plants, hydrogen research, and nuclear and fusion options are described as indispensable potential, including for new industries.

Show the original quote (page 46)
„Priorität muss sein, dass die Grundlast baldmöglichst klimaneutral gesichert werden kann.“

Translation: The priority must be that base load can be secured in a climate-neutral way as soon as possible.

Page 46 in the original

Placement

  • Climateleaning climate first

    Base load is to become climate-neutral quickly and renewable generation expanded, which gradually strengthens climate protection in the energy sector.

Speed up the hydrogen ramp-up and keep gas grids

The Free Voters want to push the market ramp-up of hydrogen and plan power, heat and gas grids together. Gas pipelines should not be dismantled. Hydrogen is to be used wherever it makes the most technical and economic sense, including in transport.

Hydrogen is a gas that can store energy. The Free Voters want to make it usable faster. Gas pipelines should stay, because they can carry hydrogen later. The power grid and the gas grid should be planned together.

In the coming legislative term, reliable national and European rules and timelines for an integrated energy system are to be set so that investment follows. The transformation plan presented by gas grid operators is to be coordinated with industry and municipalities. Electrolyzers should be spread across many regions because they can relieve power grids. The party expects growing demand for synthetic fuels, for example for ships, aircraft, heavy transport and industry. It rejects political constraints that hold hydrogen back in transport.

Show the original quote (page 46)
„Keinesfalls darf der Einsatz von Wasserstoff automatisch als unwirtschaftlich abgewunken werden, entsprechend ist der Rückbau von Gasleitungen zu verhindern.“

Translation: Under no circumstances may the use of hydrogen be automatically dismissed as uneconomical; accordingly, the dismantling of gas pipelines must be prevented.

Page 46 in the original

Placement

  • Climatebalanced

    The point combines expanding climate-friendly hydrogen with keeping gas grids and prioritizing economic viability.

Strengthen coal regions through research and innovation

The Free Voters want to cushion the effects of the coal phase-out on lignite regions and compensate for them ecologically and financially. Research and innovation funding are meant to turn these regions into climate pioneers.

Germany is ending the use of coal. This hits the coal regions hard. The Free Voters want to help these regions. More research should happen there. This should bring new companies.

The platform calls for carrying out the proposals of the coal commission. As effects of the phase-out it names extra land needed for mining natural gypsum and possible damage to water quality when open-pit mines are flooded. Research capacity is to be built up and its results passed on to local industry, for example to develop substitutes for the FGD gypsum the building materials sector will lose. The Central German lignite region in particular is to receive funding so that industry settles there.

Show the original quote (page 47)
„Die Empfehlungen der Kommission „Wachstum, Strukturwandel und Beschäftigung“ müssen zur Umsetzung kommen.“

Translation: The recommendations of the commission on “Growth, Structural Change and Employment” must be implemented.

Page 47 in the original

Placement

  • Economyleaning more state

    The state is to compensate the affected regions financially and fund research in a targeted way, which expands public spending.

  • Climatebalanced

    The coal phase-out is not questioned, but its economic effects are to be offset, so both concerns are combined.

Climate protection through technology rather than bans

The Free Voters commit to the obligations of the Paris climate agreement. They want to achieve climate and environmental protection mainly through innovation and, as far as possible, without levies and bans, while always taking social effects into account.

The Free Voters stand by the Paris climate agreement. They want to protect the climate mainly with new technology. They want to avoid bans and new charges where they can. Climate protection should stay affordable for everyone.

The program sees environmental protection as a way to keep nature, living spaces and the economy existing side by side in the long run. Citizens and municipalities should not be left alone with effects such as floods, heat, drought, storms and heavy rain. Every policy measure should take social aspects into account. In the party's view, what it calls ideological paternalism has damaged public support for climate protection.

Show the original quote (page 106)
„Wir setzen auf die Innovationskraft und den technischen Fortschritt und wollen auf Abgaben und Verbote verzichten, soweit es möglich ist.“

Translation: We rely on innovative strength and technological progress and want to do without levies and bans as far as possible.

Page 106 in the original

Placement

  • Climatebalanced

    The point keeps the Paris commitments but wants to avoid levies and bans where possible, combining both concerns.

Tie state aid to climate impact

The Free Voters want the state to take climate consequences into account when it aids companies. The platform rejects bailing out airlines with taxpayer money as clinging to old structures.

The state sometimes helps companies with money. The Free Voters want it to consider the climate when it does. The state should not simply rescue airlines. That is the party's view.

The platform generally supports federal and state stimulus programs that protect jobs in a crisis. However, it points to the Paris climate agreement, which Germany has signed. Bailing out airlines, it says, contradicts responsible use of taxpayer money. As a reason it cites foreseeable penalty payments because the transport sector is missing its climate targets.

Show the original quote (page 109)
„Doch ein Staat, der das Pariser Klimaabkommen unterzeichnet hat, muss bei staatlichen Hilfen die Klimafolgen mit in den Blick nehmen.“

Translation: But a state that has signed the Paris climate agreement must also take the climate consequences into account when granting state aid.

Page 109 in the original

Placement

  • Climateleaning climate first

    State aid is to be measured against climate consequences, giving climate protection more weight relative to preserving existing industries.

CO2 storage only under strict conditions

The Free Voters see both opportunities and risks in underground CO2 storage (CCS). Before any project, they demand expert assessments, public participation and the consent of the federal state concerned.

The gas CO2 can be pressed underground. The Free Voters see chances and dangers in this. Experts should check each project first. Citizens should have a say. The state must agree.

The conditions should also apply to CO2 pipelines and other transport facilities. The platform highlights protection of the Wadden Sea National Park. Storage sites must be proven leak-tight, even when the CO2 is taken abroad. According to the platform, drinking water, groundwater, surface waters and soils take priority.

Show the original quote (page 109)
„Im Einzelfall sind vor einer Umsetzung ausreichende Gutachten und eine intensive Bürgerbeteiligung erforderlich.“

Translation: In each individual case, sufficient expert assessments and intensive public participation are required before implementation.

Page 109 in the original

Placement

  • Climatebalanced

    The technology is neither rejected nor pushed forward but tied to environmental and participation requirements.

What do the other parties say on climate and energy?

All programs at federal level compared