Skip to content
parteiprogramm

Freie Wähler on work and social affairs

From the program “Responsibility for Germany”

2025 federal election, February 23, 2025Original PDF, 114 pagesAnalyzed on October 2, 2026

AIThe summaries and placements on this page were written by AI. No person reviews each one. How they are made

Placement on Work and social affairs

Average of the points on this page. The placement is made by AI.

Each axis measures one topic. There is no single "left" or "right" for everything here: economy, society, migration and security are kept apart. Only what the program says is placed. How to read the placement

  • Economybalanced (0), from 4 points

    Points per step: 0 clearly more state, 2 leaning more state, 0 balanced, 2 leaning more market, 0 clearly more market

  • Migrationleaning restrictive (+1), from 1 point

    Points per step: 0 clearly open, 0 leaning open, 0 balanced, 1 leaning restrictive, 0 clearly restrictive

The small columns under the bars show how many points sit on each of the five steps.

Introduce a weekly instead of a daily maximum working time

The Free Voters want to make working-time rules fundamentally more flexible. A weekly maximum working time should apply instead of a daily one, as permitted by the EU Working Time Directive.

Today there is a limit on working hours per day. The Free Voters want a limit per week instead. People can then arrange their work more freely. Health protection should stay in place.

The platform justifies the demand by saying employees and employers should be able to make full use of the opportunities of digitalization. The rules are to be designed in a family-friendly way. Protection of workers and their health is not to be weakened in the process. The benchmark is the European Working Time Directive.

Show the original quote (page 21)
„Wir fordern eine Flexibilisierung der Arbeitszeit nach EU-Arbeitszeitrichtlinie mit wöchentlicher statt täglicher Höchstarbeitszeit.“

Translation: We demand more flexible working hours in line with the EU Working Time Directive, with a weekly instead of a daily maximum working time.

Page 21 in the original

Placement

  • Economyleaning more market

    The daily maximum working time is to be replaced by a weekly one, loosening working-time regulation.

Replace Bürgergeld with social assistance

The Free Voters want to fundamentally review and reform Bürgergeld (citizen's income) and drop the name. People able to work should be pushed more firmly toward work, and Ukrainians should no longer receive the benefit automatically.

The Free Voters want to change Bürgergeld. It should be called social assistance again. People who can work should work. Those who refuse suitable work should get less than sick people. Ukrainians should no longer get the money automatically.

The party believes the name Bürgergeld gives some people the impression of a payment with nothing expected in return, which can harm recipients. Social assistance would go to people who have not paid contributions and to employees after more than twelve months of unemployment. Those who can work and turn down reasonable jobs should be worse off than sick people who cannot work. The aim is to create incentives to take up work and reduce abuse, partly because of staff shortages in the economy. Refugees from Ukraine should be placed in jobs in a more targeted way.

Show the original quote (page 21)
„Menschen, die nicht eingezahlt haben, oder Arbeitnehmern, die länger als 12 Monate arbeitslos sind, soll eine Sozialhilfe ausgezahlt werden.“

Translation: People who have not paid in, or employees who have been unemployed for more than 12 months, are to be paid social assistance.

Page 21 in the original

Placement

  • Economyleaning more market

    Basic income support is to be tied more closely to willingness to work and reduced for those who refuse jobs, emphasizing personal responsibility compared with today.

  • Migrationleaning restrictive

    Ukrainian refugees are to lose today's automatic access to Bürgergeld, meaning stricter conditions for benefits.

Make public spaces accessible

The Free Voters want to make accessibility mandatory in public spaces and to support accessible construction with subsidies. Applications for inclusion measures should be possible digitally. The aim is full participation for people with disabilities.

People with disabilities should be able to take part everywhere. The Free Voters want public squares and pedestrian zones without obstacles. For example, there should be ramps and elevators. Those who build without obstacles should get money from the state. Applications should be possible online.

Market squares, old town centers and pedestrian zones are to do without cobblestones and get elevators and ramps; people affected should take part in the planning. The federal and state governments are to subsidize new construction and renovations, especially for companies, with the platform favoring support over penalties. Digital procedures are meant to save trips to government offices and speed up processes.

Show the original quote (page 99)
„Öffentliche Plätze wie Marktplätze, Altstädte und Fußgängerzonen sollen barrierefrei gestaltet werden.“

Translation: Public spaces such as market squares, old town centers and pedestrian zones are to be designed to be accessible.

Page 99 in the original

Placement

  • Economyleaning more state

    Public subsidies and mandatory accessibility in public spaces gradually expand public spending and requirements.

Fight loneliness with funding programs

The Free Voters want to fund clubs and initiatives that work against loneliness. Access to leisure activities, volunteering and places to meet is meant to prevent isolation.

Many people feel alone. The Free Voters want to change that. Clubs should get money for meetups and shared projects. There should be more places where people can meet.

According to the program, loneliness affects people of every age and should not be a taboo. New funding programs would help clubs develop ideas that bring people together, such as joint projects, sports or cultural events. Access to leisure activities, volunteering and meeting spaces would also be supported to strengthen social cohesion.

Show the original quote (page 106)
„Wir fordern die Einführung von Förderprogrammen speziell für Vereine und Initiativen, die sich aktiv gegen Einsamkeit engagieren.“

Translation: We call for the introduction of funding programs specifically for clubs and initiatives that actively work against loneliness.

Page 106 in the original

Placement

  • Economyleaning more state

    New state funding programs for clubs are a gradual expansion of public spending.

What do the other parties say on work and social affairs?

All programs at federal level compared