Skip to content
parteiprogramm

SPD on the environment and animal welfare

From the program “Program for the Future for the 2023 State Election (Our Program for the Future)”

2023 Hesse state election, October 8, 2023Original PDF, 88 pagesAnalyzed on October 4, 2026

AIThe summaries and placements on this page were written by AI. No person reviews each one. How they are made

Placement on Environment and animal welfare

Average of the points on this page. The placement is made by AI.

Each axis measures one topic. There is no single "left" or "right" for everything here: economy, society, migration and security are kept apart. Only what the program says is placed. How to read the placement

  • Economyleaning more state (-1), from 2 points

    Points per step: 0 clearly more state, 2 leaning more state, 0 balanced, 0 leaning more market, 0 clearly more market

  • Climateleaning climate first (-1), from 1 point

    Points per step: 0 clearly climate first, 1 leaning climate first, 0 balanced, 0 leaning growth first, 0 clearly growth first

The small columns under the bars show how many points sit on each of the five steps.

Fund wolf management, pasture protection and animal shelters

The SPD wants wolf management that adequately funds the protection of grazing animals and sets clear compensation rules. It justifies this with the importance of grazing for biodiversity and habitats. Wildlife rescue stations would also be set up, and animal shelters would receive basic funding.

Wolves can kill grazing animals. The SPD wants to pay for protecting pastures. There should be clear rules for paying for damage. Hurt wild animals should get help at rescue stations. Animal shelters should get steady funding.

According to the program, farming and grazing of the cultivated landscape are essential for preserving species and habitats. Hay meadows and pastures in areas covered by the EU Habitats Directive and in biosphere reserves would get particular protection. Each county, where possible, would get a rescue station for injured wild animals. Animal shelters would receive basic funding for their tasks.

Show the original quote (page 70)
„Daher setzen wir auf ein zukunftsorientiertes Wolfsmanagement mit einer auskömmlichen Finanzierung von Weideschutzmaßnahmen und klare Entschädigungsregelungen.“

Translation: We therefore rely on forward-looking wolf management with adequate funding for pasture protection measures and clear compensation rules.

Page 70 in the original

Placement

This point touches none of the axes.

Manage and restructure forests in a near-natural way

The SPD wants a mixed, species-rich continuous-cover forest that can better adapt to the changing climate. Forests would be managed gently, with ten percent left unused. HessenForst, the state forestry enterprise, would get more staff for this.

The SPD wants to use the forest gently. Many different trees should grow there. Then the forest copes better with the new climate. One tenth of the forest should stay unused. The state forestry service should get more staff.

Clear-cutting would be avoided, and less timber would be harvested each year than grows back. Five to 15 habitat trees per hectare would be left unused, skid trails would be at least 40 meters apart, and FSC certification is treated as a minimum standard. Ecosystem services provided by forests would be paid for. The party will examine whether HessenForst can be turned back into a state agency and wants more staff, training and smaller districts there. A "Pakt für den Wald" (pact for the forest) is meant to stabilize forests; the state would use more timber in construction and procurement. Hunting would adjust game populations so that damage to forests is avoided.

Show the original quote (page 71)
„Kahlschläge und ein Aufreißen des Schirms werden vermieden und es wird jährlich weniger Holz entnommen als nachwächst.“

Translation: Clear-cutting and breaking up the canopy are avoided, and each year less timber is harvested than grows back.

Page 71 in the original

Placement

  • Economyleaning more state

    More staff at HessenForst, payments for ecosystem services and the possible return to a state agency expand the role of the state.

  • Climateleaning climate first

    Gentler management, longer rotation periods and set-aside areas strengthen carbon storage and put ecological requirements ahead of higher timber yields.

Introduce a water levy and strengthen flood protection

The SPD wants to reduce water consumption and charge a levy on use above the average household level. Water bodies should reach good condition statewide. A program would expand flood protection in light of more frequent heavy rain.

The SPD wants people to use less water. People who use a lot of water would pay a levy. Rivers and streams should get cleaner. Flood protection should get better. Cities should store rainwater better.

Revenue from the levy would pay for water-saving measures and new rainwater storage for irrigating fields. Treated surface water would be used more to relieve existing extraction areas. The party wants to use the final deadline of the EU Water Framework Directive and carry out the "100 Wilde Bäche" (100 wild streams) program. Pollutants would be reduced mainly at the source, along with riparian buffer strips and additional treatment stages at sewage plants. For flood protection, the program relies on local retention storage, so-called sponge cities, and new retention areas.

Show the original quote (page 72)
„Wir erheben zur Finanzierung eine Wasserabgabe für Verbräuche oberhalb des durchschnittlichen Haushaltsbedarfs.“

Translation: To finance this, we will charge a water levy on consumption above the average household requirement.

Page 72 in the original

Placement

  • Economyleaning more state

    A new levy limited to above-average consumption and public funding programs raise charges and public investment to a limited extent.

Habitat network on 15 percent of the state's land

The SPD wants to create a network of habitats on 15 percent of Hesse's land so that migrating species can find new living space. The administrations for nature conservation, agriculture and forestry would work together more closely and be better equipped.

The SPD wants to connect living spaces for animals and plants. This would cover 15 percent of the land in Hesse. Then animals can move around. The offices for nature, farming and forests should work together better. They should have enough staff.

The network would run along forest and path edges and small habitats in the landscape, with wildlife bridges added where needed. Landscape conservation associations would be supported in their work and founding. The bird protection plans agreed with conservation groups for wind power expansion would be staffed and carried out. Initiatives for old regional livestock breeds and seeds would be supported. Data from the EU's Copernicus program would be used for climate protection, transport and land use, and a dark-sky initiative would raise awareness of light pollution.

Show the original quote (page 72)
„Wir wollen einen Biotopverbund über Wald- und Wegränder, Strukturelemente in der Landschaft, Saum- und Trittsteinbiotope auf 15 % der Landesfläche“

Translation: We want a habitat network across forest and path edges, structural elements in the landscape, and fringe and stepping-stone habitats on 15% of the state's land

Page 72 in the original

Placement

This point touches none of the axes.

What do the other parties say on the environment and animal welfare?

All programs in Hesse compared