Skip to content
parteiprogramm

BSW on climate and energy

From the program “A Fresh Start for Thuringia. So That Things Change. BSW State Election Program for Thuringia”

2024 Thuringia state election, September 1, 2024Original PDF, 60 pagesAnalyzed on October 2, 2026

AIThe summaries and placements on this page were written by AI. No person reviews each one. How they are made

Placement on Climate and energy

Average of the points on this page. The placement is made by AI.

Each axis measures one topic. There is no single "left" or "right" for everything here: economy, society, migration and security are kept apart. Only what the program says is placed. How to read the placement

  • Economyleaning more state (-1), from 1 point

    Points per step: 0 clearly more state, 1 leaning more state, 0 balanced, 0 leaning more market, 0 clearly more market

  • Climateleaning growth first (+0.7), from 3 points

    Points per step: 0 clearly climate first, 0 leaning climate first, 1 balanced, 2 leaning growth first, 0 clearly growth first

The small columns under the bars show how many points sit on each of the five steps.

No general permission for wind power in forests

The BSW rejects a blanket permission for wind turbines in forests. Local governments and regions, together with forest owners and businesses, should decide for themselves whether and where wind power is built, since in the program's view they know local needs best.

The BSW does not want wind turbines allowed in all forests. Towns should decide for themselves. They know best what is needed locally. Forest owners and companies should have a say too.

The program wants local governments to decide on sites for wind power. For wind energy in forests, regions should decide together with forest owners, local governments and businesses. The BSW describes its energy policy as "reason instead of ideology" and favors generating power and heat close to where it is used, with a range of technologies.

Show the original quote (page 50)
„Die generelle Erlaubnis von Windenergie im Wald lehnen wir ab.“

Translation: We reject a general permission for wind energy in forests.

Page 50 in the original

Placement

  • Climateleaning growth first

    Rejecting a general opening of forest land and giving local governments more say tends to slow the expansion of wind power.

Lower energy costs and fund on-site power for firms

The BSW wants to cut energy costs in Thuringia, which it considers too high compared with other states, partly by equalizing grid fees across states. Small and mid-sized businesses struggling with energy costs should get targeted support, and citizens should share in the profits from power generation.

The BSW wants cheaper energy in Thuringia. Grid fees should be the same in all states. Small companies should get money to make their own power. Citizens should share in profits from green power. Farmers should get help making solar and biogas power.

Small and mid-sized businesses under threat would receive investment aid for generating their own power and for energy efficiency, plus a long-term special program for on-site power for small firms and crafts businesses. Another special program would support energy production in agriculture, for example from bioenergy and solar; agrivoltaics (solar panels over farmland) should get priority. The BSW wants public funding and citizen participation in renewable energy so that cheap green power reaches consumers. Neighborhood energy concepts and bioenergy villages with heat storage should also be funded. Energy agencies, the Thüringer Aufbaubank and the energy companies TEAG and TEN should be supported.

Show the original quote (page 50)
„Deshalb fordern wir eine Initiative zur Angleichung der Netzentgelte zwischen den Bundesländern.“

Translation: That is why we call for an initiative to equalize grid fees between the federal states.

Page 50 in the original

Placement

  • Economyleaning more state

    The BSW relies on additional state funding programs and citizen participation to lower energy prices.

  • Climatebalanced

    The point combines lower energy prices with support for renewable on-site generation and takes no clear side.

Technology-neutral climate policy and energy storage

The BSW wants to achieve climate and environmental protection mainly through technology-neutral innovations that can be implemented quickly, and to make Thuringia a leader in storage technologies for renewable energy. In the program's view, rash measures endanger the economy and public support for climate action; it rejects red tape imposed in the name of climate protection.

The BSW wants to protect the climate with new technology. No technology should be ruled out. Thuringia should develop good storage for green power. The BSW rejects many climate rules. Climate protection should not make life more expensive.

The program holds that renewables alone cannot yet secure Germany's energy supply. It wants to promote key technologies for a climate-neutral economy, as well as flood protection, a sustainable energy supply and agricultural research to adapt farming to climate change. Storage technologies are meant to strengthen supply security and the state as a business location. Instead of what the program sees as excessive red tape, the BSW calls for strategies to adapt to the effects of climate change.

Show the original quote (page 49)
„Thüringen soll zum Vorreiter bei der Entwicklung innovativer Speichertechnologien für erneuerbare Energie werden.“

Translation: Thuringia should become a pioneer in developing innovative storage technologies for renewable energy.

Page 49 in the original

Placement

  • Climateleaning growth first

    The BSW favors innovation and adaptation over additional mandates and puts costs and competitiveness first in climate policy.

What do the other parties say on climate and energy?

All programs in Thuringia compared