Skip to content
parteiprogramm

AfD on pensions

From the program “Time for Germany”

2025 federal election, February 23, 2025Original PDF, 177 pagesAnalyzed on October 2, 2026

AIThe summaries and placements on this page were written by AI. No person reviews each one. How they are made

Placement on Pensions

Average of the points on this page. The placement is made by AI.

Each axis measures one topic. There is no single "left" or "right" for everything here: economy, society, migration and security are kept apart. Only what the program says is placed. How to read the placement

  • Economyleaning more state (-0.7), from 3 points

    Points per step: 1 clearly more state, 0 leaning more state, 2 balanced, 0 leaning more market, 0 clearly more market

  • Migrationleaning restrictive (+1), from 2 points

    Points per step: 0 clearly open, 0 leaning open, 0 balanced, 2 leaning restrictive, 0 clearly restrictive

The small columns under the bars show how many points sit on each of the five steps.

Pay non-insurance benefits from taxes

The AfD wants social insurance benefits that are not backed by contributions to be paid from the federal budget. In the platform's view, contributions are currently being misused. This is meant to allow higher benefits or lower contribution rates.

Some social insurance benefits have nothing to do with what people paid in. The AfD wants taxes to pay for these benefits. Then more money stays in the insurance funds. Pensions can go up or contributions can go down.

The platform distinguishes between contribution-funded insurance for pensions, health, long-term care and unemployment, and tax-funded welfare benefits. It criticizes that the 2024 budget was partly repaired using the insurance funds and that Covid measures were paid for through the long-term care fund. For the pension system, the AfD expects nearly twelve percent more money if the federal government takes over these benefits. The change is to happen over the medium term.

Show the original quote (page 18)
„Versicherungsfremde Leistungen sind daher nicht aus den Beiträgen zu den Sozialversicherungen, sondern aus dem Bundeshaushalt zu finanzieren.“

Translation: Non-insurance benefits are therefore to be financed not from social insurance contributions but from the federal budget.

Page 18 in the original

Placement

  • Economybalanced

    The federal budget would carry more benefits while contributions could fall or benefits rise, which combines both poles.

Raise pension level, add more contributors

The AfD wants to raise pensions substantially and gradually reach the Western European average of just over 70 percent of final net income. To do so, more people are to pay into the pension fund, including politicians and most public employees. Retirement is to become more flexible.

The AfD wants higher pensions. The goal is about 70 percent of a person's last net pay. Politicians should also pay into the pension fund. Fewer public workers should become civil servants. After 45 years of work, people should be able to retire with no cuts.

The platform puts Germany's pension level at 53 percent according to Eurostat and points to Austria as a model. Civil servant status is to be reserved for those carrying out sovereign state functions. After 45 contribution years, retirement without deductions is to be possible. The AfD wants to offset rising pension contributions with lower taxes for workers and businesses, stop counting extra earnings against survivors' pensions, give more credit for parenthood and reform the pension law for ethnic German resettlers. It also lists an extra tax allowance of 12,000 euros for working retirees, lower income and corporate taxes, and immigration only of skilled workers.

Show the original quote (page 18)
„Unser ferneres Ziel ist es, in mehreren Schritten das durchschnittliche Rentenniveau der westeuropäischen Länder zu erreichen“

Translation: Our longer-term goal is to reach, in several steps, the average pension level of the Western European countries

Page 18 in the original

Placement

  • Economyclearly more state

    The pension level is to rise from 53 to just over 70 percent and the statutory system is to be extended to civil servants and politicians, a fundamental expansion of public old-age provision.

  • Migrationleaning restrictive

    Immigration is to be limited to skilled workers, which means stricter conditions than today.

Introduce funded pensions and a Junior savings account

The AfD wants tax incentives for private and workplace retirement savings in stocks, ETFs and funds, replacing the current subsidy schemes. In addition, the state is to open a retirement account for every newborn child with German citizenship and pay into it until age 18.

The AfD wants to support saving for old age with stocks. Savers should get tax benefits. Every newborn German child should get a savings account. The state pays in 100 euros each month for 18 years. The money is paid out only from age 65.

In the platform's view, capital markets have been neglected in securing pensions. The AfD wants to draw on models from other countries and replace existing subsidy schemes, which it describes as bureaucratic. The Junior-Spardepot applies to children with German citizenship who live permanently in Germany. From age 18 they can keep paying in themselves. Payouts start at 65 through a withdrawal plan, and the capital is locked until then.

Show the original quote (page 20)
„Bis zum vollendeten 18. Lebensjahr sollen monatlich 100 Euro aus Steuermitteln in einen ETF-Sparplan oder Aktienfonds-Sparplan eingezahlt werden.“

Translation: Until the child turns 18, 100 euros per month from tax revenue are to be paid into an ETF savings plan or equity fund savings plan.

Page 20 in the original

Placement

  • Economybalanced

    The item combines a new tax-funded benefit for children with a stronger shift of retirement provision toward capital markets and private saving.

  • Migrationleaning restrictive

    The new benefit is to apply only to children with German citizenship, excluding children without a German passport.

What do the other parties say on pensions?

All programs at federal level compared