Skip to content
parteiprogramm

Tierschutzpartei on housing

From the program “Choose Compassion”

2025 federal election, February 23, 2025Original PDF, 45 pagesAnalyzed on October 2, 2026

AIThe summaries and placements on this page were written by AI. No person reviews each one. How they are made

Placement on Housing

Average of the points on this page. The placement is made by AI.

Each axis measures one topic. There is no single "left" or "right" for everything here: economy, society, migration and security are kept apart. Only what the program says is placed. How to read the placement

  • Economyclearly more state (-1.7), from 3 points

    Points per step: 2 clearly more state, 1 leaning more state, 0 balanced, 0 leaning more market, 0 clearly more market

The small columns under the bars show how many points sit on each of the five steps.

Introduce a nationwide rent cap

The Tierschutzpartei regards housing as a basic right and calls for a rent cap covering all of Germany. Rent gouging should be consistently prosecuted. In the long run, no one should spend more than a third of their net pay on rent.

The party wants a limit on rents in all of Germany. People who charge far too much rent should be punished. Rent should cost no more than one third of take-home pay.

The platform opposes rising rents and what it sees as excessive profits by large housing corporations owning more than 100 units. Landlords and corporations should be prosecuted under the usury provision, Section 291 of the Criminal Code. The rent cap is meant to relieve tenants and get the housing market and vacancies under control. As a long-term goal, the party names a rent burden of no more than one third of net income.

Show the original quote (page 10)
„Außerdem fordern wir einen bundesweiten Mietendeckel zur Entlastung der Mieter:innen deutschlandweit.“

Translation: We also demand a nationwide rent cap to relieve tenants across Germany.

Page 10 in the original

Placement

  • Economyclearly more state

    A nationwide rent cap does not exist today and would fundamentally limit pricing in the housing market by law.

Expand public housing construction and social housing

The Tierschutzpartei wants the federal government to build housing itself and bring more existing housing into public ownership. New construction would have to include a fixed share of social housing. This is meant to slow the rise in rents.

The state should build homes itself. It should also take over more existing homes. A fixed share of new homes should be social housing. These are low-cost homes for people with little money.

The federal government should not leave housing construction to private real estate corporations. The binding quota for social housing in new construction would be based on actual need. Affordable publicly owned housing would be set aside for people in need. A uniform law would govern how social housing is allocated, and eligibility would be reviewed regularly to rule out arbitrary favoritism.

Show the original quote (page 10)
„Der Bund soll sich dafür einsetzen, selbst zu bauen, anstatt diese Aufgabe privaten Immobilienkonzernen zu überlassen.“

Translation: The federal government should commit to building itself instead of leaving this task to private real estate corporations.

Page 10 in the original

Placement

  • Economyleaning more state

    More state construction, public ownership, and a social housing quota expand the state's role in the housing market.

Fight vacancies with a levy and seizures

The Tierschutzpartei calls for a levy on vacant properties to prevent speculation. Empty residential and commercial space could be seized for temporary use. Vacant office buildings would be converted into housing.

Many homes stand empty. The party wants owners to pay a fee for that. The state should be able to take over empty rooms for a while. Empty offices should become homes.

The platform cites estimates that 600,000 to one million housing units are vacant. Landlords would receive support when units sit empty for more than a year; housing corporations with long-term vacancies would be held more accountable. The federal government would buy empty office buildings and convert them into housing. A stronger right of first refusal would help cities and towns use vacant properties for social housing.

Show the original quote (page 11)
„Die PARTEI MENSCH UMWELT TIERSCHUTZ fordert die Einführung einer Leerstandsabgabe anstelle von Bußgeldern, um spekulativen Leerstand zu verhindern.“

Translation: The PARTEI MENSCH UMWELT TIERSCHUTZ demands the introduction of a vacancy levy in place of fines in order to prevent speculative vacancies.

Page 11 in the original

Placement

  • Economyclearly more state

    A new levy on vacancies and the seizure of private space would fundamentally intervene in property rights in the real estate market.

What do the other parties say on housing?

All programs at federal level compared