Skip to content
parteiprogramm

Tierschutzpartei on transport

From the program “Choose Compassion”

2025 federal election, February 23, 2025Original PDF, 45 pagesAnalyzed on October 2, 2026

AIThe summaries and placements on this page were written by AI. No person reviews each one. How they are made

Placement on Transport

Average of the points on this page. The placement is made by AI.

Each axis measures one topic. There is no single "left" or "right" for everything here: economy, society, migration and security are kept apart. Only what the program says is placed. How to read the placement

  • Economyclearly more state (-2), from 1 point

    Points per step: 1 clearly more state, 0 leaning more state, 0 balanced, 0 leaning more market, 0 clearly more market

  • Civil liberties and securityclearly civil liberties first (-2), from 1 point

    Points per step: 1 clearly civil liberties first, 0 leaning civil liberties first, 0 balanced, 0 leaning security and order first, 0 clearly security and order first

  • Climateleaning climate first (-1.4), from 5 points

    Points per step: 2 clearly climate first, 3 leaning climate first, 0 balanced, 0 leaning growth first, 0 clearly growth first

The small columns under the bars show how many points sit on each of the five steps.

Expand local public transit and make it free in the long run

The Tierschutzpartei wants to keep the 49-euro ticket for now, then make it cheaper, and offer local transit free of charge in the long term. Traffic is to shift from cars to rail. Riding without a ticket would no longer be a criminal offense.

The Tierschutzpartei wants cheaper buses and trains. The 49-euro ticket should stay for now. Later, local transit should cost nothing. There should be more trains and routes. Riding without a ticket should no longer be a crime.

In the medium term, a cheaper ticket modeled on the 9-euro ticket is planned; prices of discounted social tickets should at least stay stable. Rail expansion, frequency and working conditions are to improve, and buses and trains should soon run on electricity. The party backs a local transit levy through which corporations contribute to their employees' mobility and to the transport transition. Fare evasion would be downgraded to an administrative offense because, in the platform's view, prison sentences are disproportionate and costlier than cheaper fares.

Show the original quote (page 21)
„langfristig wollen wir auf einen dauerhaft kostenlosen Nahverkehr setzen“

Translation: in the long term we want to move toward permanently free local public transit

Page 21 in the original

Placement

  • Economyclearly more state

    Permanently free local transit and a new levy on corporations would amount to a new public service for everyone.

  • Civil liberties and securityclearly civil liberties first

    Downgrading fare evasion to an administrative offense would remove a criminal offense.

  • Climateleaning climate first

    Shifting from private cars to electric buses and trains promotes climate-friendly mobility.

Expand the bike lane network and pedestrian zones

The Tierschutzpartei wants to build a complete, safe bike lane network faster and expand traffic-calmed areas and pedestrian zones. Car lanes and parking spaces would be repurposed for this. Cycling, walking and motor traffic would get separate paths.

The Tierschutzpartei wants more safe bike lanes. Some car lanes would become bike lanes. Cities should have more pedestrian zones. Parking spaces would make room for them. Bikes, pedestrians and cars should have their own paths.

The bike lanes are also meant to cover commuter routes between city and countryside. Planned are safe turning lanes, better markings and traffic light phases that match actual traffic. Lighting should be insect-friendly and energy-saving, triggered by motion. Non-motorized traffic would be promoted through legal rules, subsidies and more greenery in cities.

Show the original quote (page 21)
„Der Bau eines flächendeckenden und sicheren Radwegenetzes, auch für den Pendelverkehr zwischen Stadt und Land, muss schneller erweitert werden.“

Translation: The construction of a comprehensive and safe bike lane network, including for commuting between city and countryside, must be expanded faster.

Page 21 in the original

Placement

  • Climateleaning climate first

    Converting car lanes and parking spaces for cycling and walking shifts traffic toward climate-friendly modes.

Introduce a 130 km/h speed limit, stop autobahn expansion

The Tierschutzpartei demands a general speed limit of 130 km/h on autobahns to protect safety and the environment. It considers new autobahns unnecessary and wants to reform the tax break for company cars.

The Tierschutzpartei wants a speed limit on autobahns. The top speed would be 130 km/h. There should be no new autobahns. The state should stop heavily subsidizing company cars. People who truly need a car should get compensation.

Instead of expansion, the existing road network is to be maintained and rail made more attractive. Subsidies for private combustion-engine company cars are to end, with the money going into bus and rail infrastructure. People who depend on their car would receive financial compensation for higher costs. To protect wildlife, speed limits in danger zones, protective fences, green bridges and toad tunnels are to be written into road-building rules.

Show the original quote (page 22)
„fordern wir erneut eine Höchstgeschwindigkeit von 130 km/h auf Autobahnen“

Translation: we again demand a maximum speed of 130 km/h on autobahns

Page 22 in the original

Placement

  • Climateclearly climate first

    A general speed limit, no new autobahns and an end to the company car subsidy introduce new restrictions on car traffic.

Tax jet fuel and ban short-haul flights

The Tierschutzpartei wants to tax jet fuel and flights at 20 percent or more and ban short-haul and domestic flights in the long term. It cites climate protection and regards flying as a luxury. It is highly critical of airport expansion.

The Tierschutzpartei wants to make flying more expensive. Jet fuel and flights should be taxed at 20 percent or more. Short flights and flights within Germany should later be banned. Trains should be cheaper than planes.

The ban would cover flights under 500 kilometers, flights within Germany and destinations reachable by train in six hours or less. In return, money is to be invested in climate-friendly transport. According to the platform, airport expansion currently serves mainly terminals for private flights, which the party considers lacking in solidarity.

Show the original quote (page 22)
„Kerosin und Flüge müssen im Sinne des Klimaschutzes mit mindestens 20 % besteuert werden.“

Translation: Jet fuel and flights must be taxed at a minimum of 20% for the sake of climate protection.

Page 22 in the original

Placement

  • Climateclearly climate first

    A new jet fuel tax and a ban on short-haul and domestic flights are new charges and prohibitions for climate protection.

Shift freight to rail and waterways

The Tierschutzpartei wants to move heavy and freight transport onto rail and waterways in the long term and raise the truck toll to that end. This is meant to relieve roads, the environment and transport workers.

The Tierschutzpartei wants fewer trucks on the roads. Goods should travel by train and ship. The toll for trucks should go up. A toll is a fee for using the road. Later, the party wants to do without air freight.

The higher toll is meant to make rail transport more attractive and reduce environmental harm from trucks. Air freight is to be given up in the long run. Shipping is also supposed to become more sustainable.

Show the original quote (page 22)
„wollen wir die LKW-Maut anheben und somit auch den Güterverkehr auf der Schiene attraktiver machen“

Translation: we want to raise the truck toll and thereby also make rail freight more attractive

Page 22 in the original

Placement

  • Climateleaning climate first

    A higher truck toll makes road haulage costlier in order to steer freight to more environmentally friendly modes.

What do the other parties say on transport?

All programs at federal level compared