Skip to content
parteiprogramm

BSW on digital affairs

From the program “Our Country Deserves More!”

2025 federal election, February 23, 2025Original PDF, 45 pagesAnalyzed on October 2, 2026

AIThe summaries and placements on this page were written by AI. No person reviews each one. How they are made

Placement on Digital affairs

Average of the points on this page. The placement is made by AI.

Each axis measures one topic. There is no single "left" or "right" for everything here: economy, society, migration and security are kept apart. Only what the program says is placed. How to read the placement

  • Economyleaning more state (-1), from 1 point

    Points per step: 0 clearly more state, 1 leaning more state, 0 balanced, 0 leaning more market, 0 clearly more market

  • Civil liberties and securityclearly civil liberties first (-2), from 1 point

    Points per step: 1 clearly civil liberties first, 0 leaning civil liberties first, 0 balanced, 0 leaning security and order first, 0 clearly security and order first

The small columns under the bars show how many points sit on each of the five steps.

Create one central online portal for all government services

The BSW wants a single online portal for all government services where citizens and companies enter their data only once. At the same time, the party rejects digital mandates that add burdens for small businesses and the self-employed.

The BSW wants one website for all government offices. People enter their data there only once. But small firms should not be forced to use digital procedures.

The portal is meant to be the central point of contact for citizens and businesses. According to the platform, this requires all agencies to review their processes and digitize them where it makes sense. It says Germany lags far behind other industrial countries in digital administration. As examples of mandates it rejects, the BSW names compulsory electronic invoicing and lengthy privacy notices that can trigger legal warnings.

Show the original quote (page 18)
„in dem Daten nur einmal eingegeben werden müssen („Once-Only-Prinzip“) wollen wir das Leben für die Menschen vereinfachen“

Translation: in which data only has to be entered once (the "once-only principle"), we want to make life simpler for people

Page 18 in the original

Placement

This point touches none of the axes.

Ban mass surveillance and data collection

The BSW rejects blanket data retention by the state and wants to ban the collection and storage of individual behavioral data. Encryption should remain freely usable and online tracking should be curbed. The party says this is meant to prevent total surveillance of citizens.

Companies and the state collect a lot of data about people. The BSW wants to ban collecting data on how people behave. The state should not read private messages. Everyone should be allowed to encrypt their data. Encrypting means only the receiver can read a message.

As examples of state surveillance plans, the platform names the chat control proposal debated in the EU and data retention, meaning the storage of connection data without specific suspicion. For companies, it points to a data incident at VW. Cryptographic methods should be usable without restriction, and the right to free information should apply. Anyone who refuses tracking in their browser settings should neither be tracked nor asked through cookie banners. Europe should build its own digital infrastructure.

Show the original quote (page 43)
„Diesen Weg in die völlige Überwachung wollen wir stoppen und das Sammeln und Speichern individueller Verhaltensdaten verbieten.“

Translation: We want to stop this path toward total surveillance and ban the collection and storage of individual behavioral data.

Page 43 in the original

Placement

  • Civil liberties and securityclearly civil liberties first

    Data retention and chat control are rejected and the storage of behavioral data would be banned, which clearly puts privacy ahead of surveillance powers.

Promote open-source software in government and research

The BSW wants to promote open-source software and freely available AI models and help public agencies switch to them. This is meant to reduce dependence on large US tech companies and save money in the long run.

Open-source software is software whose code anyone may look at. The BSW wants to support this kind of software. Public offices should use it instead of programs from big US companies. This should save money and protect data.

The platform points to federal framework contracts with international IT companies worth 13.8 billion euros, including 4.8 billion for Oracle and 1.3 billion for Microsoft. It says open source recently made up half a percent of federal software spending. Makers that withdraw a product from the market would have to publish the source code or release license codes. Infrastructure for open-access scientific publications and research data would be secured permanently.

Show the original quote (page 43)
„Fördern wollen wir die Entwicklung und den Einsatz von Open-Source-Software sowie frei verfügbarer KI-Modelle für Anwendungen in Wissenschaft, Bildung, Kultur und öffentlicher Verwaltung.“

Translation: We want to promote the development and use of open-source software and freely available AI models for applications in science, education, culture and public administration.

Page 43 in the original

Placement

  • Economyleaning more state

    The state would actively fund software and impose a new disclosure duty on makers, which means more public steering and regulation.

A right to live without a smartphone or internet

The BSW wants a legal guarantee that people without a smartphone, computer or internet access can take part in public life. In the party's view, they should be neither excluded nor disadvantaged.

Some people have no smartphone and no internet. The BSW wants to protect them. They should still be able to take trains and get appointments. A law should secure this right.

Those affected should be able to use rail and local transit without paying extra and to receive their packages. Appointments at public offices, with doctors and with therapists should be available without digital channels. Public offices should not be reachable only through online forms and chatbots. The platform names age or a deliberate choice as reasons for going without digital devices.

Show the original quote (page 44)
„Wir treten für ein gesetzlich geschütztes Recht auf nichtdigitale Teilhabe am öffentlichen Leben ein.“

Translation: We advocate a legally protected right to non-digital participation in public life.

Page 44 in the original

Placement

This point touches none of the axes.

What do the other parties say on digital affairs?

All programs at federal level compared