Skip to content
parteiprogramm

AfD on foreign affairs and defence

From the program “State Election Program of the Lower Saxony State Chapter of the Alternative for Germany”

2022 Lower Saxony state election, October 9, 2022Original PDF, 84 pagesAnalyzed on October 2, 2026

AIThe summaries and placements on this page were written by AI. No person reviews each one. How they are made

Placement on Foreign affairs and defence

Average of the points on this page. The placement is made by AI.

Each axis measures one topic. There is no single "left" or "right" for everything here: economy, society, migration and security are kept apart. Only what the program says is placed. How to read the placement

  • Foreign policyleaning diplomacy first (-1), from 3 points

    Points per step: 2 clearly diplomacy first, 0 leaning diplomacy first, 0 balanced, 1 leaning deterrence first, 0 clearly deterrence first

    Depends strongly on the method.

The small columns under the bars show how many points sit on each of the five steps.

Reject sanctions without a UN decision

The AfD rejects all economic sanctions that were not adopted by the United Nations. In its view, sanctions are mostly ineffective and harm the domestic economy.

Sanctions are trade penalties against other countries. The AfD is against such sanctions. It makes an exception only if the United Nations decides on them. It says sanctions also hurt the German economy.

The program argues that sanctions generally fail to achieve their aim. In military conflicts in particular, they are said to worsen existing supply shortages. Only measures based on a United Nations decision are accepted.

Show the original quote (page 25)
„Die AfD lehnt Wirtschaftssanktionen, welche nicht von den Vereinten Nationen beschlossen worden sind, kategorisch ab.“

Translation: The AfD categorically rejects economic sanctions that have not been adopted by the United Nations.

Page 25 in the original

Placement

  • Foreign policyclearly diplomacy first

    Existing sanctions imposed without a UN decision, such as those of the EU, would end, giving up a central instrument of pressure in current foreign policy.

Back the Bundeswehr in Lower Saxony, keep barracks

The AfD commits to the Bundeswehr, its integration into NATO and its presence in Lower Saxony. Former barracks are to stay operational for a buildup of the armed forces in times of crisis and not be used for other purposes.

The AfD supports the Bundeswehr in Lower Saxony. Old barracks should stay ready for times of crisis. Refugees should not live there and companies should not move in. Soldiers should also talk about their work in schools.

The platform welcomes exercises by the Bundeswehr and allied troops as well as youth officers visiting schools, also as advertising for the military profession. It points to around 50 bases and about 30,000 soldiers in Lower Saxony, which it sees as an economic and security factor. The party considers training grounds indispensable. Former military properties are to be used neither as refugee housing nor commercially. The AfD supports using the Bundeswehr in disaster relief.

Show the original quote (page 80)
„Wir fordern, dass ehemalige Liegenschaften und Kasernen für eine Nutzung durch die Bundeswehr in Krisenzeiten, d. h. den dann notwendigen Streitkräfteaufwuchs, in Betrieb gehalten werden.“

Translation: We demand that former properties and barracks be kept in operation for use by the Bundeswehr in times of crisis, i.e. for the buildup of forces then required.

Page 80 in the original

Placement

  • Foreign policyleaning deterrence first

    Keeping barracks ready for a buildup and promoting military presence gradually strengthen defense readiness.

No foreign combat missions, no arms to war zones

The AfD opposes combat missions of the Bundeswehr outside the alliance's territory, especially without a UN mandate. It rejects arms deliveries to war and crisis zones, including within Europe. It says the Bundeswehr's task is national defense within the Western alliance.

The AfD wants no combat missions of the Bundeswehr outside the alliance's territory. The Bundeswehr should defend its own country. Germany should not send weapons to war zones. This also applies to Europe.

According to the platform, the Bundeswehr should not serve other countries' geostrategic interests. The rejection of arms deliveries covers Europe, the Arab world and other regions. The party sees this as a line that has proven itself for more than 70 years and should continue. It also criticizes plans to send German tanks into a foreign war while, in its view, Germany's own defense capability is poor. It wants to call for self-determination and minority protection in other countries as well.

Show the original quote (page 80)
„Wir wenden uns daher auch entschieden gegen Waffenlieferungen in Kriegs- und Krisengebiete, egal, ob in Europa, der arabischen Welt oder anderswo.“

Translation: We therefore also firmly oppose arms deliveries to war and crisis zones, whether in Europe, the Arab world or elsewhere.

Page 80 in the original

Placement

  • Foreign policyclearly diplomacy first

    Ending arms deliveries to war zones, including in Europe, and missions outside alliance territory breaks with current practice.

What do the other parties say on foreign affairs and defence?

All programs in Lower Saxony compared