Skip to content
parteiprogramm

AfD on housing

From the program “Election Platform of the AfD Hesse for the 2023 State Election”

2023 Hesse state election, October 8, 2023Original PDF, 58 pagesAnalyzed on October 2, 2026

AIThe summaries and placements on this page were written by AI. No person reviews each one. How they are made

Placement on Housing

Average of the points on this page. The placement is made by AI.

Each axis measures one topic. There is no single "left" or "right" for everything here: economy, society, migration and security are kept apart. Only what the program says is placed. How to read the placement

  • Economyleaning more market (+1.3), from 6 points

    Points per step: 0 clearly more state, 0 leaning more state, 0 balanced, 4 leaning more market, 2 clearly more market

  • Climateclearly growth first (+2), from 1 point

    Points per step: 0 clearly climate first, 0 leaning climate first, 0 balanced, 0 leaning growth first, 1 clearly growth first

The small columns under the bars show how many points sit on each of the five steps.

More new housing through land and fast permits

The AfD wants to stabilize rents and prices by increasing the housing supply. Building land would be designated faster and building rights created more quickly. The state would also relieve municipalities of the follow-on costs of housing construction.

Many cities have too few homes. The AfD wants more new homes. For this, land for building should be made available faster. Permits should come faster. The state should help towns with the costs.

The platform names a lack of new construction, people leaving rural areas, more single-person households, and migration as causes of the tight market. Besides land, faster permits should also make it easier to extract building materials such as gravel and to dispose of construction waste. Many municipalities cannot afford new housing because it brings daycare centers, schools, and roads with it; the state should help here.

Show the original quote (page 41)
„Hierzu benötigen wir mehr bedarfsgerechten Neubau und dazu wiederum die beschleunigte Ausweisung von Bauland und Schaffung von Baurecht.“

Translation: For this we need more new construction that meets demand, and for that in turn faster designation of building land and creation of building rights.

Page 41 in the original

Placement

  • Economyleaning more market

    The housing problem would be addressed through more supply and faster permits rather than price regulation.

Lower building costs by easing standards

The AfD wants to make housing cheaper by lowering building standards and scrapping the CO2 charge. Building law would also be simplified and unified nationwide. Permits would be processed faster and more digitally.

Building is expensive. The AfD wants to lower the costs. The CO2 charge should go. The rules for fire safety, insulation, and noise protection should be looser. Building law should be the same and simpler across Germany.

The platform considers current standards and requirements excessive. Rules on fire protection, thermal insulation, and soundproofing would cover only what is strictly necessary. The AfD also expects savings from standardization and therefore calls for uniform building law across Germany. Faster procedures would come from less bureaucracy and digital permitting.

Show the original quote (page 41)
„Die AfD Hessen fordert die sogenannte CO2-Steuer ersatzlos zu streichen und den geforderten Brand-, den Wärme- und den Schallschutz auf ein notwendiges Mindestmaß zurückzufahren.“

Translation: The AfD Hesse calls for abolishing the so-called CO2 tax without replacement and scaling back required fire, thermal, and noise protection to a necessary minimum.

Page 41 in the original

Placement

  • Economyleaning more market

    Fewer building rules and the removal of a charge mean less regulation and a lower burden.

  • Climateclearly growth first

    Carbon pricing would be scrapped without replacement and insulation rules lowered, abolishing a central climate instrument.

Promote home ownership, sell public housing to tenants

The AfD wants to help more people own their homes, saying ownership builds wealth and eases costs in old age. Public housing companies would have to sell their apartments to tenants. Locals and housing cooperatives would get preference in allocations.

The AfD wants more people to own their home. Tenants in public housing should be allowed to buy their apartment. Local people should come first for building plots. Housing cooperatives should also get land more easily. Young families should be able to lease land.

State and municipal housing companies would be required to offer their stock to tenants for purchase, under conditions still to be defined. In growing urban areas, locals would get priority over outsiders for plots and apartments under the so-called Einheimischen-Modell (locals-first model). The AfD sees heritable building rights, a long-term land lease, as an entry point for young families because the land does not have to be bought. Housing cooperatives would get preference when building land is allocated.

Show the original quote (page 42)
„Jeder Mieter soll das Recht erhalten, auf Grundlage noch zu definierender Rahmenbedingungen, die von ihm bewohnte Wohnung zu erwerben.“

Translation: Every tenant is to have the right, under conditions still to be defined, to buy the apartment they live in.

Page 42 in the original

Placement

  • Economyclearly more market

    Requiring public housing stock to be sold to tenants would be a far-reaching privatization of public property.

Housing benefits instead of social housing construction

The AfD wants to support low-income renters through Wohngeld (housing benefit) rather than social housing. In its view, social housing leads to units being occupied by people no longer eligible and cannot meet demand. Where Wohngeld is not enough, a municipal housing benefit would be added.

The AfD wants to rely less on social housing. People with little money should get a housing benefit. That is money to help pay the rent. In expensive cities, the town should pay an extra benefit. Cities should also secure homes for people in need.

According to the platform, many social housing residents lose their eligibility over time but stay, while eligible people go without. Housing benefit, by contrast, is paid only as long as someone is in need and keeps neighborhoods socially mixed. For groups that cannot find a home even with the benefit, cities would buy occupancy rights from landlords. The AfD is critical of further state regulation of the housing market.

Show the original quote (page 42)
„Es ist daher viel sinnvoller, einkommensschwache Mieter bedarfsgerecht mit Wohngeld zu fördern.“

Translation: It therefore makes much more sense to support low-income renters with housing benefit according to need.

Page 42 in the original

Placement

  • Economyleaning more market

    Subsidies to renters on the open market would replace publicly funded housing construction, relying more on market solutions.

Reject rent caps and rent freezes

The AfD rejects rent brakes, rent freezes, and bans on privatizing housing. In its view, such interventions worsen the problems of a housing market that would work without the state.

The AfD does not want rent caps. It does not want rent freezes either. The state should not ban the sale of public housing. The AfD says the housing market works better without these rules.

The platform calls rent brakes, rent freezes, and privatization bans overregulation. According to the AfD, state intervention makes the housing market work worse. These tools should therefore not be used.

Show the original quote (page 43)
„Die AfD lehnt daher Überregulierungen wie Mietpreisbremsen, Mietendeckel und Privatisierungsverbote ab.“

Translation: The AfD therefore rejects overregulation such as rent brakes, rent caps and bans on privatization.

Page 43 in the original

Placement

  • Economyclearly more market

    The rent brake in force today and other market interventions would go, leaving the housing market far less regulated.

Make heritage and fire rules more flexible

The AfD wants to loosen fire safety and heritage protection rules. In its view, these requirements make it uneconomical to keep village inns and historic town centers.

The AfD wants looser rules for fire safety. The same goes for protecting old buildings. The AfD says many village inns close because of these rules. Fixing up old houses costs too much.

The platform counts rural inns among cultural institutions and social meeting places. The AfD blames the closure of many inns on fire safety rules it considers excessive. In its account, entire historic town centers also suffer from strict requirements. More leeway in building law is meant to make renovation and preservation worthwhile again.

Show the original quote (page 43)
„Hier muss durch größere Flexibilität Abhilfe geschaffen werden.“

Translation: Greater flexibility must provide a remedy here.

Page 43 in the original

Placement

  • Economyleaning more market

    Fire safety and heritage requirements for buildings would be loosened, which gradually reduces regulation.

What do the other parties say on housing?

All programs in Hesse compared