Skip to content
parteiprogramm

Linke on families

From the program “Together for the Many – Achievable Through Left Politics! Our Election Platform for the 2025 Hamburg Parliament Election”

2025 Hamburg state election, March 2, 2025Original PDF, 35 pagesAnalyzed on October 3, 2026

AIThe summaries and placements on this page were written by AI. No person reviews each one. How they are made

Placement on Family

Average of the points on this page. The placement is made by AI.

Each axis measures one topic. There is no single "left" or "right" for everything here: economy, society, migration and security are kept apart. Only what the program says is placed. How to read the placement

  • Economyleaning more state (-1.5), from 2 points

    Points per step: 1 clearly more state, 1 leaning more state, 0 balanced, 0 leaning more market, 0 clearly more market

  • Civil liberties and securityleaning civil liberties first (-1), from 1 point

    Points per step: 0 clearly civil liberties first, 1 leaning civil liberties first, 0 balanced, 0 leaning security and order first, 0 clearly security and order first

The small columns under the bars show how many points sit on each of the five steps.

Reliable full-day daycare for all children

The Left wants eight hours of basic daycare for every child, plus early and late shifts where needed. Daycare centers would be funded according to need so that children have equal opportunities regardless of background.

The Left wants eight hours of daycare a day for every child. Early and late care would be offered when needed. Breakfast at daycare would be free. Daycare centers would get enough money.

Negotiated wage increases would be fully reimbursed to providers so that centers paying union rates are not disadvantaged. A skilled-worker drive would ensure that every form of training is paid. Binding emergency plans would apply during staff shortages, and time for preparation and follow-up work would count toward the staffing ratio. Housekeeping staff would also be paid a living wage. At the federal level, Hamburg would push for a Kindergrundsicherung (basic child benefit).

Show the original quote (page 15)
„Wir fordern eine verlässliche Ganztagsbetreuung für alle Kinder. Auch Früh- und Spätdienste müssen bei Bedarf abgesichert werden.“

Translation: We demand reliable full-day care for all children. Early and late shifts must also be secured where needed.

Page 15 in the original

Placement

  • Economyleaning more state

    More care hours, free breakfast and reimbursement of wage agreements expand an existing public service.

Double funding for open child and youth work

The Left wants to double funding for open child and youth work, youth social work and family support. Expansion would focus on areas with few facilities or where many people live in poverty.

The Left wants twice as much money for youth centers and family support. There would be more places for children and teens to meet. Poor neighborhoods would come first. Children and teens would have a say in their districts.

A binding planning process would align the expansion with neighborhood needs and involve residents and children. In new developments, such facilities, family centers and counseling sites would be standard and barrier-free. For staff, the plans include reimbursed wage increases, equal pay and fixed quality standards. Youth associations would be adequately funded and offer programs to prevent violence. Every district would get child and youth councils with their own budgets, along with a plan for civic education against right-wing extremism.

Show the original quote (page 15)
„Die Verdopplung der Rahmenzuweisungen für die OKJA, Jugendsozialarbeit und bei der Familienförderung.“

Translation: Doubling the framework allocations for open child and youth work, youth social work and family support.

Page 15 in the original

Placement

  • Economyclearly more state

    The allocations would be doubled, an increase of far more than a quarter, which substantially expands public services.

Ban locked placements in youth welfare

The Left wants to ban deprivation of liberty and locked facilities in youth welfare and rejects the planned facility at Klotzenmoorstieg. Instead, youth welfare services and psychiatry would cooperate more closely and decentralized services would be set up.

The Left does not want locked homes for young people. No one in youth welfare should be locked up. A planned home at Klotzenmoorstieg should not be built. There would be smaller services in many places instead.

The program opposes plans for a partly locked facility at Klotzenmoorstieg. More counseling centers and housing places would be created for young homeless people. Therapeutic and psychosocial services for underage refugees would be expanded.

Show the original quote (page 15)
„Ein Verbot von freiheitsentziehenden Maßnahmen und geschlossener Unterbringung in der Jugendhilfe!“

Translation: A ban on measures involving deprivation of liberty and on locked placements in youth welfare!

Page 15 in the original

Placement

  • Civil liberties and securityleaning civil liberties first

    The point opposes a specific planned locked facility and would rule out deprivation of liberty in youth welfare, which limits state coercion.

What do the other parties say on families?

All programs in Hamburg compared