Skip to content
parteiprogramm

Linke on foreign affairs and defence

From the program “Election Platform for the Bremen State Parliament Election on May 14, 2023 (Keeping Bremen on a Social and Ecological Course)”

2023 Bremen state election, May 14, 2023Original PDF, 78 pagesAnalyzed on October 3, 2026

AIThe summaries and placements on this page were written by AI. No person reviews each one. How they are made

Placement on Foreign affairs and defence

Average of the points on this page. The placement is made by AI.

Each axis measures one topic. There is no single "left" or "right" for everything here: economy, society, migration and security are kept apart. Only what the program says is placed. How to read the placement

  • Economyleaning more state (-1), from 1 point

    Points per step: 0 clearly more state, 1 leaning more state, 0 balanced, 0 leaning more market, 0 clearly more market

  • Foreign policyclearly diplomacy first (-1.7), from 4 points

    Points per step: 3 clearly diplomacy first, 1 leaning diplomacy first, 0 balanced, 0 leaning deterrence first, 0 clearly deterrence first

The small columns under the bars show how many points sit on each of the five steps.

Stop arms exports by state law, reject rearmament

The Left rejects the 100-billion-euro package for the Bundeswehr and wants to stop arms exports via Bremen through a state law. Arms manufacturers are to switch to civilian, ecologically sensible production, backed by a conversion fund.

The Left is against more money for weapons for the army. No more weapons should be shipped abroad from Bremen. A state law should make sure of this. Companies that build weapons should make other things. A fund should help them do so.

According to the platform, about 1,000 containers of munitions leave Bremen by ship each year. The party favors a ceasefire and negotiations and opposes weapons exports. The conversion fund is to be set up with the involvement of Bremen's economic development agency. The reasoning given is that arms production ties up scarce resources and energy, raises CO₂ emissions and comes at the expense of public services. The platform highlights that, at the Left's urging, the Senate did not approve the special fund in the Bundesrat.

Show the original quote (page 54)
„Wir fordern den Stopp der Rüstungsexporte per Landesgesetz und eine zeitnahe Umstellung (Konversion) auf zivile und ökologisch sinnvolle Produktion“

Translation: We call for a stop to arms exports by state law and a prompt switch (conversion) to civilian and ecologically sensible production

Page 54 in the original

Placement

  • Economyleaning more state

    A publicly backed conversion fund is meant to redirect companies' production through policy.

  • Foreign policyclearly diplomacy first

    A statutory stop to arms exports and rejection of the special fund fundamentally put military restraint ahead of deterrence.

End nuclear sharing, join the nuclear weapons ban treaty

The Left rejects nuclear sharing and calls for the nuclear weapons to be withdrawn from Büchel. Bremen should press at the federal level for this and for Germany to join the UN Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons.

US nuclear weapons are stored in Germany. The Left wants these weapons removed. Germany should join a United Nations treaty. This treaty bans nuclear weapons. Bremen should push the federal government to do this.

Nuclear sharing means that Germany takes part in deterrence with US nuclear weapons within NATO. The party cites a Bundestag resolution from March 2010 on withdrawing the weapons. As a member of "Mayors for Peace," Bremen should advocate for this at the federal level. The platform condemns Russia's war of aggression against Ukraine and derives from it a duty of nuclear de-escalation. Instead of arms buildup and deterrence, the Left relies on diplomacy, negotiations and nonviolent conflict resolution.

Show the original quote (page 54)
„DIE LINKE ist gegen jegliche nukleare Teilhabe und fordert endlich die Umsetzung und den Abzug der Nuklearwaffen“

Translation: THE LEFT is against any nuclear sharing and calls for implementation at last and for the withdrawal of the nuclear weapons

Page 54 in the original

Placement

  • Foreign policyclearly diplomacy first

    Leaving nuclear sharing and joining the ban treaty would end a core element of today's alliance and deterrence policy.

Keep the Bundeswehr out of schools, universities and civilian tasks

The Left wants to keep the civil clause in the higher education law and retain the ban on recruitment by military youth officers in schools. Domestic deployments of the Bundeswehr should happen only in disasters; civilian relief organizations are to be expanded.

The army should not advertise in schools. Universities should not do research for the military. Inside Germany, the army should only help in disasters. Civilian helpers like the federal relief agency should become stronger. Universities should do more research on peace.

The civil clause commits universities to research for peaceful purposes. The Bundeswehr is to be required not to enlist minors ("straight 18"). Deployments in public services such as health care are to become unnecessary by expanding civilian crisis organizations, from the Technisches Hilfswerk (federal relief agency) to medical crisis response. At Bremen's universities, the party calls for a larger research area on peace, civilian conflict resolution and the climate effects of armaments.

Show the original quote (page 55)
„Der Einsatz der Bundeswehr im Innern muss sich auf Katastrophenfälle beschränken.“

Translation: Deployment of the Bundeswehr inside the country must be limited to disasters.

Page 55 in the original

Placement

  • Foreign policyleaning diplomacy first

    Limiting the Bundeswehr's role in education, research and domestic tasks gradually restricts the military's presence.

Ban arms shipments through Bremen's ports

The Left wants to use the port operations law to ban the shipment of arms and ammunition through Bremen's ports. In this way it aims to hinder arms exports approved by the federal government.

Weapons are shipped through the ports in Bremen. The Left wants to ban that. A state law would be changed to do so. The party wants to slow down weapons sales abroad this way.

The program argues that these weapons are used around the world and kill people. Bremen cannot prevent export licenses granted by the federal government, for example to states like Saudi Arabia. As a transshipment hub, however, the state could block exports through its own port law.

Show the original quote (page 72)
„Wir fordern, im Hafenbetriebsgesetz den Umschlag von Rüstungsgütern zu verbieten.“

Translation: We demand that the handling of military goods be banned in the port operations law.

Page 72 in the original

Placement

  • Foreign policyclearly diplomacy first

    A ban on handling arms does not exist today; it would block arms exports through the state's ports.

What do the other parties say on foreign affairs and defence?

All programs in Bremen compared