Suspend biometric surveillance in public spaces
The Greens call for an immediate halt to biometric surveillance in public spaces and reject cooperation with companies such as Palantir. Surveillance measures are to be independently reviewed and must prove their benefit. In the party's view, more surveillance does not automatically bring more security and puts freedom at risk.
The Greens do not want face recognition in streets and squares. They do not want to work with companies like Palantir. Experts should check whether surveillance really helps. Instead of more technology, there should be more prevention and more people on site.
The moratorium is to apply immediately. Existing and planned surveillance measures are to be evaluated independently and openly, with the security gain demonstrated in a verifiable way. New technology is to be used only if it is proven to increase security. An overall surveillance audit is to assess all measures together so that intrusions on fundamental rights stay proportionate. Instead of digital surveillance, the platform relies on prevention and presence on the ground.
Show the original quote (page 74)
„Wir setzen uns für ein Moratorium für biometrische Überwachung im öffentlichen Raum ein und lehnen die Zusammenarbeit mit intransparenten Anbietern konsequent ab.“Translation: We advocate a moratorium on biometric surveillance in public spaces and firmly reject cooperation with non-transparent providers.
Placement
- Civil liberties and securityleaning civil liberties first
A moratorium on biometric surveillance and a burden of proof for surveillance measures limit the tools of security agencies in favor of civil liberties.