Skip to content
parteiprogramm

BSW on agriculture

From the program “Brandenburg – Sensible and Fair.”

2024 Brandenburg state election, September 22, 2024Original PDF, 42 pagesAnalyzed on October 2, 2026

AIThe summaries and placements on this page were written by AI. No person reviews each one. How they are made

Placement on Agriculture

Average of the points on this page. The placement is made by AI.

Each axis measures one topic. There is no single "left" or "right" for everything here: economy, society, migration and security are kept apart. Only what the program says is placed. How to read the placement

  • Economybalanced (-0.5), from 4 points

    Points per step: 0 clearly more state, 3 leaning more state, 0 balanced, 1 leaning more market, 0 clearly more market

The small columns under the bars show how many points sit on each of the five steps.

Relieve farmers of costs and red tape

The BSW rejects additional burdens on farmers and wants to keep the tax breaks on agricultural diesel. Bureaucracy and documentation duties should shrink, and farm subsidies should become simpler. At the federal level the party advocates ending Grundsteuer A (the property tax on farm and forest land).

The BSW wants to ease the load on farmers. Diesel for farmers should stay cheaper. Farmers should have fewer forms to fill out. Subsidies should be easier to get. The property tax on farm land should go.

The platform refers to 55 proposals for cutting red tape made by the state farmers' association in February 2024. Duplicate documentation and repeated data collection should end, and requirements such as crop rotation, set-aside and minimum soil cover should become simpler. The joint federal-state funding scheme GAK should run for several years instead of one. Grundsteuer A should go because, according to the BSW, it costs more effort than it raises. Further goals are help with adapting to climate and weather, more money for young farmers starting or taking over a farm, support for forestry businesses with bark beetle damage instead of threatened penalties, and long-term legal certainty.

Show the original quote (page 38)
„Weitere Belastungen für Landwirte, wie sie die Bundesregierung jüngst beschlossen hat (Agrardiesel), lehnen wir ab.“

Translation: We reject further burdens on farmers such as those recently adopted by the federal government (agricultural diesel).

Page 38 in the original

Placement

  • Economyleaning more market

    Keeping the farm diesel tax break, ending Grundsteuer A and reducing requirements gradually lower taxes and regulation for one sector.

Expand regional processing and marketing

The BSW wants to reduce farmers' dependence on large dairies, large slaughterhouses and food corporations. To that end, regional structures for production, processing and marketing should be built up, backed by long-term funding programs.

The BSW wants farmers to depend less on big corporations. Food should be made and sold in the region. The path from farm to customer should be short. There should be long-term funding for this.

The platform speaks of an oligopoly of food corporations, meaning the market power of a few large players, which it wants to break up. Short and transparent supply chains should lower dependence on the world market and secure food supply. In the BSW's view, regional economic cycles in farming and industry promote stability, local ties and ecological balance. As framework conditions at the federal and EU level, the party names price stability and protective tariffs on certain farm imports.

Show the original quote (page 38)
„Wir wollen kurze transparente Lieferketten, die Abhängigkeiten vom Weltmarkt verringern und unsere Ernährungssicherheit stärken.“

Translation: We want short, transparent supply chains that reduce dependence on the world market and strengthen our food security.

Page 38 in the original

Placement

  • Economyleaning more state

    State-funded regional structures, action against market power and protective tariffs intervene more strongly in the farm market.

Protect farmland from investors and development

The BSW wants to reform the land market and pass a farm structure law so that farmland goes first to local farmers. State-held BVVG land should be transferred to Brandenburg and leased only to local family farms and cooperatives. The party rejects any further paving-over of farmland.

The BSW wants to secure farmland for farmers from the region. Investors should not make money by trading farmland. There should be a new law for this. Federal land should go to the state of Brandenburg. Farmland should no longer be built on.

The platform calls access to land the decisive question for the future of farming and criticizes the failure of the state government's farm structure law. It says purchase and lease prices have risen sharply, especially around Berlin, and outside investors with no farming background are buying into farms. The BVVG manages formerly state-owned East German land for the federal government; this land should pass to state control. No more agricultural land should be sealed.

Show the original quote (page 39)
„Reform des Bodenmarktes – landwirtschaftliche Flächen müssen vorrangig für ortsansässige Landwirte zur Verfügung stehen und dürfen nicht als Spekulationsgut für Investoren dienen.“

Translation: Reform of the land market – agricultural land must be available first to local farmers and must not serve as an object of speculation for investors.

Page 39 in the original

Placement

  • Economyleaning more state

    A farm structure law and leasing public land only to local farms regulate the land market more strongly than today.

Strengthen livestock farming, allow action on wolves and beavers

The BSW wants to give livestock farms much stronger support through a master plan and reduce their burdens. For wolves, beavers and cormorants, the party calls for active wildlife management with financial compensation for damage and the option to intervene when there is danger.

The BSW wants to help farmers with animals more. There should be a big plan for this. Wolves, beavers and cormorants sometimes cause damage. Farmers should get money for that. When there is danger, action against these animals should be allowed.

In the BSW's view, the burdens cause animal production to move to countries with lower animal welfare standards and wage dumping. The platform justifies wildlife management with the population growth required by EU environmental policy. Interventions should spare the species as a whole and be permitted when livestock, dikes or waterways are at risk. Farming and landscape management associations should be consulted as early as nature conservation groups.

Show the original quote (page 39)
„Wir wollen einen Masterplan zur Stärkung der Tierhaltung auf den Weg bringen zur deutlich stärkeren Unterstützung der viehhaltenden Betriebe.“

Translation: We want to launch a master plan to strengthen livestock farming and give much stronger support to livestock farms.

Page 39 in the original

Placement

  • Economyleaning more state

    A master plan with much more state support and compensation for wildlife damage expands public aid for one sector.

What do the other parties say on agriculture?

All programs in Brandenburg compared