Skip to content
parteiprogramm

AfD on housing

From the program “Making Berlin Strong.”

2026 Berlin state election, September 20, 2026Original PDF, 99 pagesAnalyzed on October 2, 2026

AIThe summaries and placements on this page were written by AI. No person reviews each one. How they are made

Placement on Housing

Average of the points on this page. The placement is made by AI.

Each axis measures one topic. There is no single "left" or "right" for everything here: economy, society, migration and security are kept apart. Only what the program says is placed. How to read the placement

  • Economybalanced (+0.4), from 5 points

    Points per step: 0 clearly more state, 1 leaning more state, 1 balanced, 3 leaning more market, 0 clearly more market

  • Climateclearly growth first (+2), from 1 point

    Points per step: 0 clearly climate first, 0 leaning climate first, 0 balanced, 0 leaning growth first, 1 clearly growth first

  • Migrationleaning restrictive (+1), from 1 point

    Points per step: 0 clearly open, 0 leaning open, 0 balanced, 1 leaning restrictive, 0 clearly restrictive

The small columns under the bars show how many points sit on each of the five steps.

Give locals priority for subsidized housing

The AfD wants subsidized housing to go first to people who were born in Berlin or have lived there for many years. A points system would govern allocation, and a special building law for locals would be created. The platform argues that long-term Berliners are at a disadvantage when looking for housing.

The AfD wants subsidized homes to go to Berliners first. That means people born in Berlin or living there for a long time. A points system would decide who gets a home. Building homes for locals would also become easier.

The points system would combine length of residence with social criteria: income, number of children, caring for relatives, and work in fields such as police, fire service, nursing, childcare or public transit. The priority would apply to rental apartments and to units of state-owned housing companies that are put up for sale. The AfD wants to change the cooperative land development model so that homes built under it also go preferentially to locals under this system. In addition, Section 246 of the Federal Building Code, which today contains special rules for refugee housing, would be rewritten. The goal is a special building law for locals in tight housing markets, with easier exemptions and simplified changes to zoning plans.

Show the original quote (page 5)
„Wir treten deshalb dafür ein, dass Berliner, die hier geboren sind oder seit vielen Jahren in unserer Stadt leben, bei der Vergabe von gefördertem Wohnraum vorrangig berücksichtigt werden.“

Translation: We therefore advocate that Berliners who were born here or have lived in our city for many years be given priority in the allocation of subsidized housing.

Page 5 in the original

Placement

  • Migrationleaning restrictive

    Priority based on length of residence and a special building law replacing the rules for refugee housing would leave recent immigrants worse off in access to housing than today.

Ease private investment, limit neighborhood preservation rules

The AfD wants to boost rental housing construction through less regulation and relies on private housing companies to do so. It rejects expropriation and wants to scale back Milieuschutz (neighborhood preservation zones). In the platform's view, a large housing supply is the best way to keep rents down.

The AfD wants fewer rules for building homes. Private companies should build more rental homes. The AfD is against expropriating housing companies. Expropriation means the state takes property away from its owner. Rules that protect existing neighborhoods should also be less strict.

The platform wants to remove obstacles that limit the supply of rental apartments and to create an investment-friendly environment. The AfD rejects expropriation and what it calls planned-economy instruments, arguing that they create no new housing and deter investors. For preservation zones under Section 172 of the Federal Building Code, it seeks a change in the law so that alterations and new construction become easier there. It justifies this in part with the need to adapt housing to an aging population. Tenants should also find it easier to become owners.

Show the original quote (page 6)
„Wir lehnen planwirtschaftliche Instrumente und die Enteignung von Wohnungsunternehmen strikt ab“

Translation: We strictly reject planned-economy instruments and the expropriation of housing companies

Page 6 in the original

Placement

  • Economyleaning more market

    Less building regulation, looser preservation rules and the rejection of expropriation shift housing policy toward the market.

Pay rent subsidies and bring back the misallocation levy

The AfD wants to pay rent subsidies to people who hold a housing entitlement certificate so they can find an apartment on the open market. It thus favors supporting people rather than buildings. Those who live in social housing without being in need would again pay a levy.

The AfD wants to pay money for rent directly to people. This is for people with a housing entitlement certificate. They could then rent a home themselves. People who are no longer poor but live in social housing would pay extra.

Housing benefit would be supplemented with rent subsidies for holders of a Wohnberechtigungsschein (housing entitlement certificate), instead of making them wait for new social housing to be built. The platform cites studies saying that more than half of social housing tenants are not, or no longer, in need. The Fehlbelegungsabgabe (a levy on tenants who no longer qualify) would therefore return. The AfD also calls for a general ban on subletting social housing to prevent abuse.

Show the original quote (page 6)
„Wir setzen uns deshalb für eine Ergänzung des Wohngeldes um Mietzuschüsse für Inhaber eines Wohnberechtigungsscheins (WBS) ein.“

Translation: We therefore advocate supplementing housing benefit with rent subsidies for holders of a housing entitlement certificate (WBS).

Page 6 in the original

Placement

  • Economyleaning more market

    Subsidies for renting on the open market instead of building social housing shift housing support more toward the market.

Make heating bills transparent and cap back payments

The AfD wants tenants to see every cost component in their heating bill and be able to compare providers. State-owned housing companies would have to buy energy in a way that shields tenants from short-term exchange prices. The platform points to high back payments whose causes tenants cannot trace.

The AfD wants clear bills for heating costs. Tenants should see all costs in detail. The state's housing companies should buy energy differently. High back payments should have a limit.

The platform attributes higher energy prices to the energy transition and to taxes and singles out heat contracting as opaque. In the future, all cost factors would have to be disclosed in the bill. The AfD wants to oblige state-owned companies to buy energy in a way that does not depend on short-term swings in exchange prices. Violations would lead to a legal cap on back payments. For unclear bills, the burden of proof would be reversed.

Show the original quote (page 7)
„dass in den Heizkostenabrechnungen künftig sämtliche Kostenfaktoren für die Mieter transparent offengelegt werden müssen“

Translation: that in the future all cost factors must be transparently disclosed to tenants in heating bills

Page 7 in the original

Placement

  • Economyleaning more state

    New disclosure duties, a cap on back payments and a reversed burden of proof regulate landlords and suppliers more than today.

Promote home ownership and housing cooperatives

The AfD wants to help more Berliners own their homes, with public loan guarantees and an exemption from the real estate transfer tax for a first owner-occupied purchase. Investors based outside the euro area would instead pay 20 percent. Housing cooperatives would also get more support.

The AfD wants more Berliners to own their home. The state should help with a loan guarantee. A guarantee means the state backs the loan. A tax should be dropped for the first purchase. Housing cooperatives should get more help too.

The platform cites Article 28 of the Berlin constitution, which provides for promoting home ownership, and gives an ownership rate of 15 percent in Berlin compared with about 70 percent in the EU. It says ownership protects against poverty in old age and rising rents. People who earn enough but cannot get a loan for lack of equity would receive a public guarantee. The Grunderwerbsteuer (real estate transfer tax) would be dropped for local first-time buyers of owner-occupied homes and set at 20 percent for investors based outside the euro area. Cooperatives would get preference for state-owned building plots and in any privatization of public housing, especially those with a long track record.

Show the original quote (page 9)
„werden wir die Grunderwerbsteuer für einheimische Ersterwerber selbstgenutzten Wohneigentums vollständig abschaffen“

Translation: we will completely abolish the real estate transfer tax for local first-time buyers of owner-occupied homes

Page 9 in the original

Placement

  • Economybalanced

    The point combines a tax exemption and private ownership with state guarantees and a new high tax on certain investors.

Simplify the building code and lower insulation standards

The AfD wants to speed up building permits by slimming down Berlin's building code. Insulation requirements would return to the level of the early 2000s because, in the platform's view, cost and effort outweigh the benefit. It rejects new state-level duties such as retrofitting solar panels.

The AfD wants building in Berlin to go faster. There should be fewer building rules. Houses would need less insulation. The AfD is against a duty to add solar panels to old houses.

The rules of Berlin's building code would be cut and simplified. As an example, the platform says an approved new building should no longer require a separate demolition permit for the old structure. The AfD wants to lower energy standards for insulation to the level of the early 2000s, arguing that cost and red tape are out of proportion to the efficiency gained. It rejects additional state-level obligations such as retrofitting photovoltaic systems.

Show the original quote (page 9)
„die aktuellen energetischen Baustandards bei der Gebäudedämmung auf das Niveau der frühen 2000er-Jahre zurückzusetzen“

Translation: to reset the current energy standards for building insulation to the level of the early 2000s

Page 9 in the original

Placement

  • Economyleaning more market

    A slimmer building code and fewer requirements reduce regulation for builders.

  • Climateclearly growth first

    Insulation requirements would be rolled back by about two decades, fundamentally weakening current climate rules for buildings.

Protect allotment gardens and weekend settlements

The AfD wants to preserve inner-city allotment gardens permanently and secure them legally. Weekend settlements would also be protected. Citing growing social hardship, it wants their users to be allowed to live there year-round for a limited period.

The AfD wants to keep the allotment gardens in Berlin. Zoning plans should protect the gardens. Weekend settlements should stay too. People should be allowed to live there full-time for 20 years.

Areas designated as green space or allotments in the land-use plan and listed under protection category 2 of the allotment development plan would be kept for the long term. Binding zoning plans would secure them further. For people in weekend settlements, the AfD seeks a right of permanent residence, initially limited to 20 years.

Show the original quote (page 10)
„Der Erhalt der innerstädtischen Kleingartenanlagen ist für die Berliner AfD ein zentrales landespolitisches Anliegen.“

Translation: Preserving inner-city allotment gardens is a central state-policy concern for the Berlin AfD.

Page 10 in the original

Placement

This point touches none of the axes.

What do the other parties say on housing?

All programs in Berlin compared